What does determine the harmonic number in standing waves?

AI Thread Summary
The harmonic number in standing waves is determined by the largest wavelength that fits within specific boundary conditions, such as open or closed ends. The fundamental frequency, or first harmonic, corresponds to the longest wavelength that can resonate in the given space. For pipes, the harmonic number is influenced by whether the ends are open or closed, with specific wavelengths corresponding to each harmonic. In laboratory settings, a single frequency is typically applied to create a standing wave, while real-world scenarios often involve multiple harmonics occurring simultaneously. Ultimately, the presence of damping and the applied frequency dictate which harmonics are established.
brainyman89
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
what does determine the harmonic number in standing waves?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of the biggest (largest wavelength) standing wave you can fit in your boundary conditions (open at both ends, open at one end, closed at both ends), this is harmonic number 1 (the fundamental frequency). For one end open it's 1/4 a wavelength, for both open or both closed it's 1/2 a wavelength. Then draw the second biggest you can, that's the second harmonic (3/4 a wavelength for one end open, 1 wavelength for both closed/open). Then the third biggest (third harmonic), etc. This is the harmonic number
 
i know what is harmonic number, i was asking about what determines it, for example in a pipe, whether it is of one or two openings, who decide what the harmonic number is i.e can we control it?? why does the first harmonic occur and not the second or vice versa?

thanks for answering
 
it's the first, second, third, etc. largest wave that fits the boundaries. That IS what determines it.
 
The standing wave needs a force applied at the correct frequency, to replace the energy lost by damping etc.

In a lab experiment you usually apply a force at one frequency only, so you can only get a standing wave at the that frequency.

In real-world situations there is no reason why you can't have several standing waves simultaneously, and in fact that is usually what happens.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...

Similar threads

Back
Top