MHB What does it mean for G to be consistent with Q?

  • Thread starter Thread starter agapito
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between Golbach's conjecture (G) and Robinson's Arithmetic (Q). It establishes that G is true if and only if Q cannot prove the negation of G (¬G). Additionally, it asserts that G is true if and only if G is consistent with Q. The term "consistent with Q" is clarified to mean that G and Q do not contradict each other, implying that it is impossible to derive both a statement and its negation using G and Q. The soundness of Q reinforces its consistency, providing a foundation for this relationship.
agapito
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
My text if Smith's Godel book. We establish that G (Golbach's conjecture and a Π1 wff of Robinson's Arithmetic Q) is true if and only if Q cannot prove ¬G.

That much is clear. But then it goes on to say:

G is true if and only if G is consistent with Q.

We know that Q is sound (and thus consistent), so can someone please explain what "consistent with Q" means.

Thanks for all help.
 
Technology news on Phys.org
"G is consistent with Q' simply means that G and Q do not contradict each other. That, in turn, means that we cannot use G and Q to prove both statement "T" and statement "not T".
 
HallsofIvy said:
"G is consistent with Q' simply means that G and Q do not contradict each other. That, in turn, means that we cannot use G and Q to prove both statement "T" and statement "not T".

Greatly appreciate your help with this, agapito
 
Thread 'Is this public key encryption?'
I've tried to intuit public key encryption but never quite managed. But this seems to wrap it up in a bow. This seems to be a very elegant way of transmitting a message publicly that only the sender and receiver can decipher. Is this how PKE works? No, it cant be. In the above case, the requester knows the target's "secret" key - because they have his ID, and therefore knows his birthdate.
I tried a web search "the loss of programming ", and found an article saying that all aspects of writing, developing, and testing software programs will one day all be handled through artificial intelligence. One must wonder then, who is responsible. WHO is responsible for any problems, bugs, deficiencies, or whatever malfunctions which the programs make their users endure? Things may work wrong however the "wrong" happens. AI needs to fix the problems for the users. Any way to...
Back
Top