What does it mean to say that two things are coupled or not decoupled ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AxiomOfChoice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coupled Mean
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the concepts of "coupled" and "not decoupled" in the context of equations of motion, particularly for diatomic molecules. When two degrees of freedom, such as vibrations and rotations, are coupled, their equations of motion include terms that interrelate them, making their behaviors dependent on one another. In contrast, decoupled systems operate independently, with no interaction terms affecting their dynamics. The example provided illustrates how adding a term that involves both degrees of freedom changes the system from decoupled to coupled. Understanding these relationships is crucial for analyzing complex physical systems.
AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
What does it mean to say that two things are "coupled" or "not decoupled"?

In a paper I'm reading, it says that "the vibrations and rotations are no longer decoupled for large angular momentum." (This is discussing a diatomic molecule.) What, exactly, does this mean?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


This means that the equations of motion (or the Lagrangian itself) has a term that mixes vibrational and rotational degrees of freedom, and that this terms is negligible at small angular momentum.

Imagine that x is a degree of freedom for rotations, and y is a degree of freedom for vibrations. Then the equations of motion:

x' = x + x^2
y' = y + Sin(y)

are decoupled in x & y, x & y are essentially independent (although there may still be a constraint involving both of them e.g. a boundary condition). Compare this to the situation:

x' = x + x^2 + y
y' = y + Sin(y) + Cos(x)

Now x & y are coupled! Although the example I'm presenting is artificial and non-quantum, coupled/decoupled equations are general terms in systems of differential equations, I'm just giving an example. In all cases decoupled subsystems behave independently of one another after the initial conditions have been set.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...

Similar threads

Back
Top