What Does the Metric Tensor Imply in This Context?

redstone
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I've read that the metric tensor is defined as
{{g}^{ab}}={{e}^{a}}\cdot {{e}^{b}}

so does that imply that?
{{g}^{ab}}{{g}_{cd}}={{e}^{a}}{{e}^{b}}{{e}_{c}}{{e}_{d}}={{e}^{a}}{{e}_{c}}{{e}^{b}}{{e}_{d}}=g_{c}^{a}g_{d}^{b}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, that can't be correct. For example, let ##a = 1, b = 2, c = 1, d = 2## and assume we're dealing with the standard Minkowski metric.

Then ##g^{ab}g_{cd} = g^{12}g_{12} = 0\cdot 0 = 0##

But, ##g^a_cg^b_d = g^1_1g^2_2 = 1\cdot 1 = 1##
 
redstone said:
I've read that the metric tensor is defined as
{{g}^{ab}}={{e}^{a}}\cdot {{e}^{b}}

so does that imply that?
{{g}^{ab}}{{g}_{cd}}={{e}^{a}}{{e}^{b}}{{e}_{c}}{{e}_{d}}={{e}^{a}}{{e}_{c}}{{e}^{b}}{{e}_{d}}=g_{c}^{a}g_{d}^{b}

Nope. You lost the dot product completely when you went to the next expression. If your metric is diagonal is g^{01}g_{01}=g^0_0 g^1_1?
 
The easiest way to understand the metric tensor is to use dyadic notation:

I = (ei\cdotej)eiej = gij eiej = (ei\cdotej)eiej = gij eiej

Any vector or tensor dotted with the metric tensor returns that vector or tensor unchanged. Thus, the metric tensor can be regarded as the identity tensor.
 
Makes sense. thanks for all the help
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top