What Does the Metric Tensor Imply in This Context?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications and properties of the metric tensor in the context of tensor algebra, particularly in relation to the Minkowski metric. Participants are examining the relationships between components of the metric tensor and exploring the validity of certain expressions involving the metric.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are analyzing the expression involving the metric tensor and questioning the validity of certain equalities. Some are attempting to clarify the implications of the metric tensor's definition and its application in specific cases, while others are challenging assumptions made in the derivations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing differing viewpoints on the relationships between the metric tensor components. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of the metric tensor, and there is an ongoing exploration of the implications of various assumptions.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of standard definitions and properties of the metric tensor, specifically in the context of Minkowski space. There is a focus on the accuracy of mathematical expressions and the implications of the metric's structure.

redstone
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I've read that the metric tensor is defined as
[tex]{{g}^{ab}}={{e}^{a}}\cdot {{e}^{b}}[/tex]

so does that imply that?
[tex]{{g}^{ab}}{{g}_{cd}}={{e}^{a}}{{e}^{b}}{{e}_{c}}{{e}_{d}}={{e}^{a}}{{e}_{c}}{{e}^{b}}{{e}_{d}}=g_{c}^{a}g_{d}^{b}[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, that can't be correct. For example, let ##a = 1, b = 2, c = 1, d = 2## and assume we're dealing with the standard Minkowski metric.

Then ##g^{ab}g_{cd} = g^{12}g_{12} = 0\cdot 0 = 0##

But, ##g^a_cg^b_d = g^1_1g^2_2 = 1\cdot 1 = 1##
 
redstone said:
I've read that the metric tensor is defined as
[tex]{{g}^{ab}}={{e}^{a}}\cdot {{e}^{b}}[/tex]

so does that imply that?
[tex]{{g}^{ab}}{{g}_{cd}}={{e}^{a}}{{e}^{b}}{{e}_{c}}{{e}_{d}}={{e}^{a}}{{e}_{c}}{{e}^{b}}{{e}_{d}}=g_{c}^{a}g_{d}^{b}[/tex]

Nope. You lost the dot product completely when you went to the next expression. If your metric is diagonal is [itex]g^{01}g_{01}=g^0_0 g^1_1[/itex]?
 
The easiest way to understand the metric tensor is to use dyadic notation:

I = (ei[itex]\cdot[/itex]ej)eiej = gij eiej = (ei[itex]\cdot[/itex]ej)eiej = gij eiej

Any vector or tensor dotted with the metric tensor returns that vector or tensor unchanged. Thus, the metric tensor can be regarded as the identity tensor.
 
Makes sense. thanks for all the help
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
843
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K