What electronic comonents damaged in an EM Pulse

AI Thread Summary
An electromagnetic pulse (EMP) can severely damage various electronic components, particularly silicon chips, resistors, and capacitors, with passive elements being most vulnerable to induced currents. Resistors may fail due to thermal overstress, while capacitors can experience dielectric breakdown when exposed to transient currents. In vehicles, older ignition systems may still function without certain components like condensers, but newer systems with diodes are likely to be damaged. Additionally, unshielded wires can act as antennas, potentially allowing EMP effects to reach shielded components. Overall, the consensus is that an EMP would likely render most electronic devices inoperable.
kenimpzoom
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I was debating on another forum about EM Pulse (yes, I just watched War of the World :-p ).

Anyway, does anyone know exactly what electrical components will be damaged by an EMP?

I know silicon chips would be dead, but what about capactors, diodes, resistors, etc.

Also, if a cars computer is shielded in a Faraday cage, would the unsheilded wires leading to the computer act as some type of antenna and still fry the computer?

Thanks, Ken
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
b) Passive elements. The passive elements most susceptible to
damage from HEMP-induced currents are those with very low voltage or power
ratings and precision components for which a small change is significant.
Resistor failures due to high-level pulsed currents are caused by energy-
induced thermal overstress and voltage breakdown. Resistor failure threshold
can be calculated from the resistor's parameters and the empirical relation
given in reference 2-9. Exposure of capacitors to transient currents sets up
a voltage across the capacitor that increases with time. For nonelectrolytic
capacitors, this voltage keeps rising until the capacitor's dielectric
breakdown level is reached. That point is typically 10 times the d.c. voltage
rating. For electrolytic capacitors, the voltage relationship holds until the
zener level of the dielectric is reached. After that, damage can occur. The
damage threshold for electrolytic capacitors in the positive direction is 3 to
10 times their d.c. voltage rating. For the negative direction it is one-half
their positive failure voltage (ref 2-10). Transformer and coil damage due to
HEMP-induced currents results from electric breakdown of the insulation. The
pulse-breakdown voltage is typically 5500 volts for power supply transformers
and 2750 volts for small signal transformers (ref 2-11).

http://jya.com/emp02.htm

It seems that most damage will be due to induced currents.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sounds like everything would be toast.

I was debating on weather or not an old car with a "points" style ignition system would still work. The condensor would probably be fried, but I think it would still run without a condensor (just not very good).

If the car had a newer style voltage regulator, the diodes would fry, but the old style regulators would probably still work.

Thanks, Ken
 
The wires inside the coil would likely be shot as well, so spark ignition might not be a good choice.

Near satellite observatories where they have clean zones for RFI/EMI they drive old mechanical injection diesel cars inside the zone to prevent adding any extra electrical interference. From that, the converse would seem logical that it would be simple to bypass any electrical fuel cutoff and replace with a mechanical valve to get an old diesel car running after an EMP event.

Strangely you'd likely no way to fill it up unless you find a farm with an overhead gravity feed diesel tank, look at even FL last year after the last hurricane cut power for 4-5 days and people thought it was the 18th century! And you'd have no headlights, and no radio - wait, why even bother driving... :smile:
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top