What equations relate to the symmetry of equipotential lines?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the symmetry of equipotential lines in the context of an experiment involving electric charges. The original poster is confused about how to complete the equipotential line diagram, particularly regarding the symmetry related to the x-axis and y-axis. Participants emphasize the need for clarity on the initial conditions of the diagram and the nature of the charges involved. They suggest that the equipotential lines can be derived from the electric field generated by the charges and inquire about the relevant equations for calculating the electric field and potential. The conversation highlights the importance of visualizing the setup accurately to determine the correct symmetry and equipotential lines.
Mimyo
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
complete this equipotential line.
Relevant Equations
.
KakaoTalk_20200923_162021373_01.jpg
This is the second quadrant of the equipotential line. I think this would be symmetry but I'm not sure what to do.
Is this going to be the symmetry of both the x-axis and y-axis and the symmetry of the y-axis is ( - )?

Sorry for the bad English! feel free to leave comment if you can't understand the question, thank you!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Mimyo said:
Homework Statement:: complete this equipotential line.
Relevant Equations:: .

View attachment 270056This is the second quadrant of the equipotential line. I think this would be symmetry but I'm not sure what to do.
Is this going to be the symmetry of both the x-axis and y-axis and the symmetry of the y-axis is ( - )?

Sorry for the bad English! feel free to leave comment if you can't understand the question, thank you!
Welcome to PhysicsForums. :smile:

The problem statement and the graph/drawing are very confusing. What is the full problem statement? What is at the origin? Charge? Current? A point of something or a distribution of line charge or something?

And what did the blank diagram look like before you started trying to draw lines on it? Were the long straight lines at angles there before, or did you draw those with a ruler? Were only the dotted lines in arcs on the drawing before, and all of the rest of the lines are yours?
 
  • Like
Likes Mimyo
berkeman said:
Welcome to PhysicsForums. :smile:

The problem statement and the graph/drawing are very confusing. What is the full problem statement? What is at the origin? Charge? Current? A point of something or a distribution of line charge or something?

And what did the blank diagram look like before you started trying to draw lines on it? Were the long straight lines at angles there before, or did you draw those with a ruler? Were only the dotted lines in arcs on the drawing before, and all of the rest of the lines are yours?
Professor just gave me the picture, since we can't do the experiment due to COVID 19. So this is the result of the "equipotential line experiment". The picture I posted is the 1/4 of the result and the original one (That I have to complete) is below. Line of electric force flows from + to -, and you can see the ( + ) in the picture.

KakaoTalk_20200923_161951630.jpg


So, I haven't drawn any lines. According to his advice, I have to symmetry to x or y-axis and connected dots going to be the equipotential line. After that, I have to symmetry the equipotential line again.

Thanks for helping me T_T
 
Okay, thanks. That helps a lot. So there are +/- charges on the x-axis at +/- 28 (whatever units), right?

Probably the Equipotential lines look a lot like the diagram below. But what equation would you use to calculate the E-field at any point as the sum of the contributions from each of the two charges? And how does that relate to the equation for the potential generated from that vector E-field?

1601156719073.png
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top