What Factors Affect the Lifetime of B+ and Bc Mesons?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ghetom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lifetime Mesons
ghetom
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to understand why the Bc meson (anti b and c) has a lifetime of 0.46 picoseconds whilst the Bs, B+ and B- have lifetimes of ~1.6 picoseconds. Is this a density of states thing? or to do with the CKM elements?

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems to be at least partly due to more available decay channels for the Bc. They say the decay is dominated by decays of the charm quark (70 percent). And in addition to all the other things that quarks can do, the charm quark can decay to a strange. Which is a channel that would not be available in a meson that had strange to begin with. :rolleyes:
 
One way to look at this is that there are three ways a Bc can decay (the b can decay, the c can decay, or the two can annihilate) vs. only one for the B0. The fact that the lifetime is a factor of three shorter is coincidence.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top