What Forces Affect a Cyclist Coasting and Climbing a Slope?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Min_Shin
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the forces acting on a cyclist coasting and climbing a slope. For a cyclist with a total mass of 100kg on a 4.5-degree incline, the force of friction is calculated to be approximately 77N. When attempting to ride up the slope at the same speed, the cyclist would need to exert a force of around 154N to counteract both gravity and friction. However, if he only exerts 150N, he may not have enough force to ascend the hill, raising questions about his ability to climb. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the balance of forces in cycling dynamics.
Min_Shin
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A man of mass 85kg, on a bicycle of mass 15kg, coasts down a slope inclined at 4.5* to the horizontal, at a constant speed of 4.7m/s.
a)what is the force of friction on the man and his bicycle?
b)if the man wanted to ride up the same slope at the same speed, what force would he have to exert?
c)if the man exerted a force of 150N up the hill, at what rate would he accelerate?

a)I thought the force of friction would be equal to the sine angle componenet of the force of gravity on the mass. 100g*sin 4.5* = 77N

b) Since going up the hill, i thought he needs a force that could counterbalance both slide force of the mass and friction force (since the movement is up the hill now), so i doubled the magnitude of the friction force i got at a) 77N * 2 = 154N

c) But now i was wondering if he only exerts 150 N up he wouldn't even be able to climb the hill.. which i don't think is the answer to the question

Where did i go wrong?

btw thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume part c) is the only thing bothering you. Suppose the man starts up the hill with some velocity. You can still calculate an acceleration. He might even make it to the top of the hill.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top