What fraction of its kinetic energy is rotational?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angular velocity and the fraction of kinetic energy that is rotational for a sphere rolling down an incline. The gravitational potential energy is equated to the sum of linear and rotational kinetic energy, leading to the use of formulas for rotational kinetic energy and the moment of inertia of a sphere. The participant successfully determines the angular velocity but seeks assistance with calculating the fraction of kinetic energy that is rotational. The conversation emphasizes the application of conservation of mechanical energy in pure rolling motion. Overall, the focus is on understanding the relationship between linear and rotational dynamics in this scenario.
spoon
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
An 8.90-cm-diameter, 310 g sphere is released from rest at the top of a 2.00-m-long, 17 degree incline. It rolls, without slipping, to the bottom.

a) What is the sphere's angular velocity at the bottom of the incline?
b) What fraction of its kinetic energy is rotational?

If someone could help me out, it'd be great...I'm not exactly sure how to tackle this problem...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To start off...

Gravitational Potential Energy = Linear Kinetic Energy + Rotational Kinetic Energy

...Rotational Kinetic Energy = 1/2 I w^2

w(its called omega) = v/r

I of Sphere = (2/5)mr^2...

..thusly...Rotational Kinetic Energy = (1/2)[(2/5)mr^2][v/r]^2...which simplifies to..
...(1/10)mv^2

Work from there...
 
anaylizing both movement rotational and linear we should consider a kinetic energy of the sum of both the linear of its center of mass and the rotational. Apply Conservation of Mechanical Energy because it's pure rolling motion (no slipping).
 
Last edited:
I kind of get what you're saying but I'm still sort of lost?
 
Actually now I got part A...I just need part B...
Thanks for the help by the way
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top