What happens if I have a rotating half-wave plate?

AI Thread Summary
Rotating a half-wave plate at 1 Hz does not change the intensity of unpolarized light passing through it, as the plate only rotates the polarization direction without affecting intensity. Unpolarized light can be viewed as randomly varying linearly polarized light, with no fixed relationship between polarization states over time. When unpolarized light passes through a half-wave plate, it remains unpolarized after transmission. The rotation of the half-wave plate does not alter the overall polarization state or intensity of the incoming unpolarized light. Therefore, the outgoing beam remains unpolarized regardless of the rotation speed of the half-wave plate.
Corwin_S
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
Hey there,

What would happen if I had a half-wave plate, and I rotated it at like 1 Hz? If I stick a linear polarizer on the other end, what would my outcoming beam look like if the incoming one was natural light?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by natural light?
 
Sorry. Unpolarized light from a laser.
 
Unpolarized light can be modeled as a randomly varying linearly polarized light, i,e, take a snapshot of the wavefront you will see it is polarized in one direction, take another snapshot at different time you will see it's polarized in another direction, it's just that there is no fixed relationship connecting the polarization states at different times. Now a half-wave plate is pure rotator, it only rotates the polarization direction of a linearly polarized light but keeps the intensity constant. If you let your unpolarized light pass through a half-wave plate, obviously the outgoing light will also be unpolarized without change in intensity because at every instant of time the polarization of an incident wavefront is just rotated. If you rotate the half-wave plate with a certain rate, do you think the polarization state as well as the intensity of an incoming unpolarized light will change given the random nature of the polarization state?
 
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top