What Happens to a Comet's Orbit at Aphelion with Decreasing Angular Momentum?

kala
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a comet which passes through its aphelion at a distance rmax from the sun. Imagine that, keeping rmax fixed, we somehow make the angular momentum l smaller and smaller though not actually zero; that is we let l\rightarrow0. Use equations c=l2/\gamma\ mu and rmax=c/1-\epsilon, rmin=1+\epsilonto show that in this limit the eccentricity, \epsilon of the elliptical orbit approaches 1 and the distance of closest approach rmin approaches zero.

Homework Equations



the equations posted above look funny, but for c it should be c=l2/gamma*mu
rmax=c/1-epsilon and rmin= c/1+epsilon.

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, I know that I am going to need to take limits. what i tried was to substitute in the c for the rmax equation, but then i really didn't know where to go from there. any help would be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, physically what happened if you too l--> 0 What you reall did is take your orbital velocity to zero.

L = mV X R

You assumed aphelion, so R was fixed. Assuming mass went to zero would just make the commet float away. What wil happen is the commet will make a b-line straight for the sun.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top