B What happens to the Low Pass Filter as frequency approaches 0 and infinity?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter houlahound
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
As frequency approaches 0 in a low pass filter, the output approaches 1, indicating a DC open circuit for the capacitor. Conversely, as frequency approaches infinity, the output approaches 0, signifying that the capacitor acts as a short circuit. The discussion highlights the mathematical behavior of the filter function, specifically how terms in the equation influence the output at these limits. A misunderstanding about the behavior of the first term led to confusion regarding the output at DC. Ultimately, the analysis clarifies the expected outcomes for a low pass filter across varying frequencies.
houlahound
Messages
907
Reaction score
223
Low pass filter function

1/x(sqrt(R^2+1/(x^2)))

Just to show the limits as x approaches 0 and infinity, where x is frequency.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Concise question ! Looks like homework, so PF culture requires some attempt at solution on your part. What do you propose ?
 
Self studier here, not enrolled in a course so HW is kind of a misnomer.

It should equal 1 at x = 0 ie DC, open circuit for capacitor and zero for frequency approaches infinity ie capacitor is short circuit.

It can't tho cos of the first term in x goes to 1/0 ie infinite at DC.
 
Self studier here
Kudos !

Simple recipe: for ##\ \ x\downarrow 0\ \ ## you want to be looking at something like ##\ \ A + x\ \ ## and for ##\ \ x\rightarrow\infty\ \ ## you want something like ##\ \ B + {1\over x}\ \ ##.

To wit for ##\ \ x\rightarrow\infty\ \ ##:$$ { 1\over x \sqrt{R^2+{1\over x^2}}}$$the last term in the denominator disappears besides R2 so you are left with ##1\over x R##.

For ##\ \ x\downarrow 0\ \ ## you bring the x inside the root: $${ 1\over \sqrt{x^2 R^2+1}}$$ and now the first term disappears besides the 1.
 
  • Like
Likes houlahound
thanks, I cast the problem of x approaching 0 as

(1/x)*1/(stuff)

and wrongly insisted that due to the first term (1/x) that the behaviour had to blow up to infinity.

I wanted the equation to fit my expectation even tho I knew the behaviour of the low pass in advance.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
984
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top