What Happens When You Pitch a Baseball at 90% the Speed of Light?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vhbelvadi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Baseball
AI Thread Summary
When a baseball is pitched at 90% the speed of light, it would disintegrate upon colliding with air particles, releasing immense energy due to relativistic effects. The discussion highlights the necessity of vacuum conditions in particle accelerators to prevent destructive collisions with air. At such high speeds, the kinetic energy of the baseball approaches its rest mass energy, leading to a significant energy release upon impact. The energy output from this collision would be calculated using E=mc^2, indicating a massive explosion. Overall, the scenario illustrates the extreme consequences of relativistic speeds on matter.
vhbelvadi
Messages
67
Reaction score
1
I came across this from xkcd today. The question seems interesting, but I was wondering if this expplanation quite covers this or are there other possibilities? (Also, is something wrong with this explanation?)

Basically they're dealing with a baseball pitched at relativistic speeds.

http://what-if.xkcd.com/1/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
haha, yeah, something like that would probably happen. The ball would definitely get destroyed. Particle accelerators must be vacuum for this reason - if there was air in there, then the particles would collide with them. So if there was a ball going at this speed, then all the particles in the ball would collide with the air particles, giving off ridiculous amounts of energy.
 
@BruceW - An open air particle accelerator--my thoughts exactly!
So, basically, it's 150g of particles colliding with air molecules, so wouldn't the collision (for now let's assume there's no batter for a good distance) cause the entire ball to disintegrate resulting in the generation of energy we can't quite handle?
Or will it be within comparatively safe limits?
 
at 0.9c, the kinetic energy is at a similar level to the rest mass energy. And from what you know about E=mc^2, this is going to be a huge amount of energy since we have a tenth of a kilogram of mass to play with.

Edit: So, specifically, the energy output of the explosion will be of the order of c^2 times by 1/10 kilogram
 
Last edited:
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top