What Have Educators Learned About Distance Learning?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anorlunda
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The recent experience with distance learning has highlighted significant challenges, particularly the lack of access to technology, with about 30% of students lacking reliable internet or computers. Overall, students have expressed a strong preference for face-to-face learning, finding remote education unsatisfactory. While some strategies for the fall term include hybrid models and repurposing large spaces for classes, concerns remain about the integrity of online assessments and the effectiveness of remote teaching methods. Additionally, there has been an increase in students struggling with basic study skills, exacerbated by the challenges of online learning environments. The ongoing situation underscores the need for adaptive strategies to support both students and educators in navigating these unprecedented educational challenges.
  • #61
Andy Resnick said:
Ok, that's your opinion.

It's also troubling that the teacher posted a deliberately wrong answer on Chegg.

BTW, who is Jearl whom you mentioned in your post?

And did what you posted actually take place, or was it a gamed scenario?
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #62
atyy said:
It's also troubling that the teacher posted a deliberately wrong answer on Chegg.

BTW, who is Jearl whom you mentioned in your post?

And did what you posted actually take place, or was it a gamed scenario?

Jearl = Jearl Walker, I assume the comment I posted actually occurred, but I have no information about it. Jearl was not the professor who asked the impossible question, just my colleague who forwarded me the idea.
 
  • #63
Chegg denies this happened. ("Fake news" is what they called it) Their position is a teacher wouldn't be able to post an incorrect answer on Chegg.
 
  • #64
Andy Resnick said:
Jearl = Jearl Walker, I assume the comment I posted actually occurred, but I have no information about it. Jearl was not the professor who asked the impossible question, just my colleague who forwarded me the idea.

Wow, Jearl Walker is your colleague?! Sorry, Andy, you've got an impressive CV, but Jearl Walker is legendary. When I was in junior college (equivalent to US grades 11 & 12), the vice-principal of my school, knowing I was interested in physics, recommended I read Jearl's Flying Circus. OK, I confess I did locate the book in the school library, but never did more than flip a few pages. But in one of the later versions of Halliday and Resnick, I still remember Jearl's suggestion that the final exam for a physics class should be to walk on hot coals - that would be a real test of whether a student believed in the laws of physics. Not sure how to set that as a take-at-home exam with safeguards for cheating ...
 
  • Like
Likes JC2000 and jedishrfu
  • #65
Vanadium 50 said:
Chegg denies this happened. ("Fake news" is what they called it) Their position is a teacher wouldn't be able to post an incorrect answer on Chegg.

By googling I found an earlier version of the story from 2019 that refers to an in-class exam. So it might be apocryphal.
 
  • #66
vela said:
I've found it's not just a few students either. Most of the class somehow suddenly does significantly better than expected. If they are all indeed cheating, it's disappointing that such a large fraction of students have no qualms about doing it.

The subject of cheating came up just the other day on a mailing list I'm on. One instructor said he allows students to use any resource they want, but they have to turn in essentially a short essay on how they solved the problem. So students can look up and find a similar problem on Chegg, but if they can't articulate their reasoning, they're not going to get much credit. I'm thinking of doing this in summer and possibly in fall if I'm still stuck giving exams online.

The first exam that I gave online this semester was right after we went completely online. It was, in fact, the first week we went to totally remote learning. So I did not have much time to prepare and basically gave the same exam that I had written for an in-class, closed-book exam. I made it open book, and that's when the D and C students suddenly did very well, while the 3 A students did poorly.

I am not surprised by this, because I've seen this before. I've also seen where students did amazingly well with their online homework problems, but when I took one of the problems and put the same, EXACT problem in an in-class, closed-book exam, 1/3 to 1/2 of the students could not do the problem correctly. When I asked these students what happened, none of them could give me an answer. Draw your own conclusion (this is my running theme).

For the final exam this week, none of the free-response questions are taken from anywhere. I had time to prepare this time, and all the questions came out of my own head. So they can Chegg or google them all they want. To me, this is the most direct step I can take to prevent someone from looking up solutions that may exist somewhere. And in my exam, they have to upload their solutions, because they have to show work to get full credit. As I've said before, all my students were told to have a scanner app that they can use to scan handwritten work. So they have to show how they obtained the solutions, not just give me an answer.

I'm still weary and suspicious of the quality of understanding of students that went through an online course, especially in physics. This whole mess has not change my mind.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes JC2000, bhobba, jasonRF and 4 others
  • #67
LIKE LIKE LIKE LIKE
ZapperZ said:
I'm still weary and suspicious of the quality of understanding of students that went through an online course, especially in physics. This whole mess has not change my mind.
 
  • Like
Likes jasonRF
  • #68
atyy said:
Wow, Jearl Walker is your colleague?! Sorry, Andy, you've got an impressive CV, but Jearl Walker is legendary.

Why are you sorry? He's 2 doors down from me and is every bit as awesome as you expect.
 
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu and atyy
  • #69
Andy Resnick said:
He's 2 doors down from me and is every bit as awesome as you expect.

I kind of imagine a floor of hot coals and a chair that's a bed of nails.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Andy Resnick, atyy and anorlunda
  • #70
I recently started teaching high school Physics in a private school in Latin America. This private school is very similar to a public high school in the US. It is not as expensive as a charter school, but not cheap either. I had a smartboard, whiteboard, and laptop in each classroom. All the students have smartphones and access to a computer with internet, although they might have to share with siblings or parents.

Before the pandemic, my classes would be like this: introduce the topic with real life examples, work out the relations, explain what they mean, and do examples. I also had a lab which I divided into two sessions (so they could also complete a report). During the second week that we did the lab, I also put a classwork of 5-6 problems with each problem exploring a concept. The difficulty was linear with the last problem being as difficult as one of the last problems in each section of the book. Problems were taken from the school book (Holt 2012 ed.) or from outside resources like Physics Classroom website and Schaum's 3000 Physics Problems. Then came the tests which were concepts, problem solving, and a challenge bonus problem.

I've transitioned this to a virtual classroom with a setup that took me a few weeks to get right but fortunately I already had a few things working (google classroom) and a tablet pc I bought at the beginning of the school year. But before I get into that, let me talk about my experience with students.

My class is of 30 students on average. In the A,B+ range there's two types, usually a few who simply are good at math and don't need much help and others that do well but with effort. I'd say these two make like a 1/4. There's another 1/4 (mostly B,B-) that is honest and doesn't cheat but simply make too many mistakes or lack math skills. They remember the concepts though! From the remaining half, 2/3 cheat, and the last group has some type of disorder such as ADD or simply doesn't pay attention at all in class. Nobody is failing (but that's because of the system's curve). The Fs and Ds are from those that cheat and/or don't turn in assignments. They get F in tests but unfortunately I haven't thought of a way to penalize them in homeworks if the procedure is correct. However I'm very strict with significant figures and not skipping steps so just cause answer is correct doesn't mean full credit and that's where I kinda penalize them.

There's two ways I tackled the cheaters:
  1. Changing the wording of the problem and data.
  2. Coming up with your own problems.
Changing the wording actually prevented them from finding the problem online. However, even though it wasn't the correct solution, there were several similar wrong solutions (they found an equation, but not the right one). Ok, at least that's traditional cheating, but I encourage group work so even though I know who copies from who I'm not on a witch hunt. The thing about these problems is that they are simple and cover different concepts or approaches. They are the classic problems found in textbooks.

Coming up with your own however has to be done very carefully. Obviously if what you are asking is the same as a textbook problem you are rewording it. So I came up with real-life situations, simplified them, and then came up with a problem. Even though there wasn't any Physics beyond what they knew, the students had trouble applying the Physics or math to that real-life situation though. I had to guide them a lot more. Almost no one cheated here. I graded leniently too, however when the test came most of them knew what to do or at least the first few steps. Almost no blank problems too. So coming up with completely new and different problems, if you guide them through, can actually help them understand the Physics better. I realized later that the reason they had so much trouble was because they couldn't just apply a formula (two-step problems).

Something that pretty much kept me on track with classes was that I make my own presentations. These presentations have the most important ideas, videos, the derivation is written in latex, and they have examples. I try to write just the most important in the slides, and then do the rest by writing on the slide (now I use the tablet, but before I was doing it on the smartboard). The examples were solved on the whiteboard, and the same solution was presented clearly step by step in the presentation with latex. I also complement the presentation by how I interact with the students and set the transitions.

The way I'm working right now is by preparing youtube videos with these presentations and also doing conference calls. The youtube video is a one-sided lecture of me explaining everything in my presentation and working out examples. I do this by recording what I write on the Power Point with my commentary. It's the same I do in class except for the interactions. With the conference calls, I go over the same presentation (hoping they've seen the videos) and for examples my smartboard is Microsoft Whiteboard which I write on with my tablet. It does a good job and you can also share the link of your whiteboard. Basically, I share my screen of Whiteboard for problem-solving, and of a PowerPoint presentation if I'm lecturing. I also save what I wrote in Whiteboard and send it in a PowerPoint. The students also have access to the class recordings. Here the problem is the obvious difference that students could see me and I could ask them directly. Now when I try the same, there are almost no answers or questions. The ones that asked a lot before, still ask, but a lot less.

As for the lab, I used one of the PHET simulations. It was actually a virtual lab. I wrote guidelines, and asked them to fill a report. I showed them how to work and get data from the simulation. I also explicitly in the conference calls explained what is that I wanted to see in the report. For example, in the results they had to calculate some parameters so I explained what values are reasonable or not for the answer. This was this week so I haven't graded it yet. However, no one complained and I wasn't getting much questions as with other labs. It was much easier for them though.

The homework I put was the type were I changed the wording only. I gave them an assignment through Google Classroom and they sent back their work. It was usually a PDF which I graded with "Comments" from Adobe Acrobat. I haven't sent these files back but I do give them a solution and work out the problems with them. I just don't want to upload over 100 files one by one so I need to figure a convenient solution. Here, my interaction with the students was on the private forums from Google Classroom. I did have a lot of students or the same student asking a lot of questions. I encouraged this and even had a private call with a few students. Unfortunately, the ones who cheat still cheat. However, in general, there was an improvement in grades.

Something I did differently, was for each problem that I gave, I would give them hints. Enough hints, that they should get the answer right away. The reason for this, is because this is the end of the year and I want them to understand this last chapter at least. I want them to take away the most important parts, not necessarily master the material. Now, this is something I have to revise if schools are still closed by Fall.

I have also put an online test. I used Forms from Google Docs and even found out how to put a timer but I didn't include it in the end. This test was set so that only one email could be used to answer it and it had to be approved by me or the school. This test was mostly concepts but I did put word problems and a bonus. As for the concepts, most did pretty well. In the word problems I found the same as with the homeworks. There was a fraction that copied from each other a solution they found. Basically, they found out an equation that gave the solution and used it without showing where it came from. There were even more copying this time, I believe, because it was a test. The bonus was only attempted by the A students. I did find a good average on the concept part of the test.

My setup is actually two computers right now, and a camera with a capture card. It's like a streamer setup but with my tablet pc as a wacom. The Microsoft Whiteboard allows me to write in the tablet, and see it on my other computer with I use in the conference call and is conected to the camera and the headset. I'm using OBS Studio for recording.

Right now, we have three weeks left. They have to submit a homework, I'm putting another online test (focused on concepts), and there's a presentation (I wanted them to build something but that's no longer possible).

When this all started, I looked for online or distance learning Physics classes. Other than virtual tutors there isn't much information. I hope I'm on the right track here. I need to seriously revise all this if we are to continue next year online. The advantage of the concept test is that it's the diagnostic to see how I did teaching online.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes jedishrfu, bhobba, vanhees71 and 4 others
  • #71
I had an experience sort of like fake answers posted online while teaching complex analysis, and it did trap my student, but it was accidental. I gave a take home exam, which was open book. Apparently some students assumed this meant they could research answers online, although I had only meant that our designated book was open to them. When I handed back the graded work, one student complained that I had made a mistake by counting a particular answer as wrong. The reason they gave was that the online answer source for our book had a different answer from mine. I went ballistic: not only had the student copied the answer from an answer book, whose existence I had not suspected (why would anyone waste time writing out all the problem answers for a book when that does no one any good?), but they had disrespected my expertise, which hurt my ego. The answer in the answer book was wrong due to a basic error made by the graduate student writing the book, but I was insulted that my student did not think their professor was more reliable than some random online source. Allowing my ego to get involved was my error, and I almost missed the opportunity to teach my student.

By telling me openly that they had copied the answer from online, it is arguable that the student thought this was acceptable, and I now think I should have been more clear in my expectations. This is the sort of behavior you and I probably would think is so clearly out of line that it would not need clarification, but to some students, everything has to be spelled out. My opinion is that at least this one student probably would not again consult an answer book online if I said that was not permitted. I did not give the student credit for that problem, which was wrong, but i did not penalize them more severely for cheating, since I was convinced they really did not get the point that online research for answers was off limits. In teaching, and examining, it seems there is almost nothing one can safely take for granted. So no matter how faithfully you anticipate it will be abided by, I suggest making absolutely every expectation completely explicit in these circumstances.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes member 587159 and anorlunda
  • #72
LuisFelipe said:
So I came up with real-life situations, simplified them, and then came up with a problem. Even though there wasn't any Physics beyond what they knew, the students had trouble applying the Physics or math to that real-life situation though. I had to guide them a lot more. Almost no one cheated here. I graded leniently too, however when the test came most of them knew what to do or at least the first few steps. Almost no blank problems too. So coming up with completely new and different problems, if you guide them through, can actually help them understand the Physics better. I realized later that the reason they had so much trouble was because they couldn't just apply a formula (two-step problems)

Fantastic post! I wanted to highlight this in particular- that's exactly what I do in my classes :)
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes mathwonk, Klystron, anorlunda and 1 other person
  • #73
berkeman said:
I wonder if installing web cameras in the classroom to show the instruction and the behavior of the students would help.

In my experience of substituting, the school would try to enforce some discipline, the parents would react by taking the kid to a doctor who'd diagnose them with ADD or some other issue. The parents woudl demand a special curriculum and other paperwork for their child exempting them from any discipline of any kind. The kid would win and the class would lose.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #74
@berkeman: "I wonder if installing web cameras in the classroom to show the instruction and the behavior of the students would help."

I once convinced an elementary/junior high teacher in rural Georgia to film her arithmetic class so we could discuss how various presentations worked. The camera was set up in the back of the room. When she reviewed the film, it revealed one student in the class taking out a gun and handing it to another one, so she was unwilling to let the film be used or viewed, and erased it.

This was part of a project funded by the Carnegie Foundation on precollege math education in the US. Even with this editing, the film of what was allowed to be viewed just flabbergasted the non southerners on the evaluative panel. It was one of those investigative projects that winds up with the researchers saying: "but we had no idea!" Meanwhile those of us in the trenches just deal with it.
 
  • Wow
  • Informative
Likes berkeman and atyy
  • #75
atyy said:
Yes, I would consider asking a question with no answer to be a lie in the context of an exam.

I was asked on an exam if the Jacobson radical of a polynomial ring is the polynomial ring of the jacobsonradical: ##J(R[X])= R(J[X])##.
I responded that that was an open question in ring theory and that was the correct answer.

Some questions can be answered even if it is not the answer you expect.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and berkeman
  • #76
Math_QED said:
I was asked on an exam if the Jacobson radical of a polynomial ring is the polynomial ring of the jacobsonradical: ##J(R[X])= R(J[X])##.
I responded that that was an open question in ring theory and that was the correct answer.

Some questions can be answered even if it is not the answer you expect.

Fine points do not change the fundamental double deception of the scenario presented in post #24. What sort of society do we want our students to build?
 
  • #77
atyy said:
Fine points do not change the fundamental double deception of the scenario presented in post #24. What sort of society do we want our students to build?
The sort in which cheating on important things is discouraged. (I did take an extra look at post #24.)

Using an online search to find a cheat for a technical or scientific academic examination is a big-item cheat and this kind should not be allowed. The teacher or professor who wrote that quoted article was being very honest with the students about his method to catch cheaters.
 
  • Like
Likes member 587159
  • #78
atyy said:
Teachers should detect cheating and ensure that exams are as fair as possible, but they should use honest methods.
Would you be fine with the tactic if a correct solution was posted but worded and completed in a rather unique way? I've noticed when students cheat, because they often don't know what they're doing, they copy everything in a solution—mistakes, unique notation, etc.—often even preserving the relative positioning of work on the paper.

I guess I'm wondering why you think the teacher is being deceptive here. Teachers aren't obligated to inform students about the anti-cheating methods they're using.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71, member 587159 and berkeman
  • #79
symbolipoint said:
The sort in which cheating on important things is discouraged. (I did take an extra look at post #24.)

Using an online search to find a cheat for a technical or scientific academic examination is a big-item cheat and this kind should not be allowed. The teacher or professor who wrote that quoted article was being very honest with the students about his method to catch cheaters.

Yes, I agree that teachers must try to detect and prevent cheating. Teachers must try to make sure exams are fair. But I do not agree that the teacher in that scenario was honest.

vela said:
Would you be fine with the tactic if a correct solution was posted but worded and completed in a rather unique way? I've noticed when students cheat, because they often don't know what they're doing, they copy everything in a solution—mistakes, unique notation, etc.—often even preserving the relative positioning of work on the paper.

I guess I'm wondering why you think the teacher is being deceptive here. Teachers aren't obligated to inform students about the anti-cheating methods they're using.

The teacher is dishonest because
(1) He deliberately set a flawed question
(2) He deliberately posted a flawed solution to Chegg
Setting flawed questions and posting flawed solutions are not dishonest in themselves - that happens, and when it does, one tries to correct the error. However, in this case, these were done purposefully, which makes it dishonest.

Please note that at this time no evidence has been presented here that such an incident actually took place.
 
  • #80
atyy said:
he teacher is dishonest because
(1) He deliberately set a flawed question
(2) He deliberately posted a flawed solution to Chegg
Setting flawed questions and posting flawed solutions are not dishonest in themselves - that happens, and when it does, one tries to correct the error. However, in this case, these were done purposefully, which makes it dishonest.

Please note that at this time no evidence has been presented here that such an incident actually took place.
One would intuitively understand that Chegg is not a primary source for knowledge and trustworthy answers, but maybe this is incorrect thinking.
 
  • #81
symbolipoint said:
One would intuitively understand that Chegg is not a primary source for knowledge and trustworthy answers, but maybe this is incorrect thinking.

Well, obviously a fake scenario, would have been more convincing if it had said PF :oldbiggrin:

Joking here obviously (before I get sued by Chegg)
 
  • #82
Coming to more on-topic discussion, the semester is finally over for me, and I can take a big sigh of relief.

My physics class, for the first time ever, did not have a single "A" grade. It was disappointing considering that when we went to totally remote, I had 3 out of 7 who were in the A range. All 3 had their grades dropped considerably after we went online, even when I hounded after them for either missing assignments or struggling to complete certain tasks.

The only consolation here was that no one had a grade below a "C". I think the final exam that I gave (which all came out of my head and not found online or on Chegg... at least for now) was quite a challenge even for an open-book exam. It wasn't extra hard, just ... challenging .. since it incorporated stuff from not only from this semester, but also the previous physics course (this was a "Physics 2" course). So they had to solve a bit of mechanics as well that was part of the whole problem.

My Astro class was close to being a trainwreck. About 1/3 of the students failed, and most of them didn't even take the final exam. I think they were declaring a "No-Credit" to take up the school's offer to be able to retake the course during the next 3 semesters for free if they end up with either an "F" or "D".

There is an art and a science to teaching online. That much I know. Without understanding not only the techniques, but also the pedagogy and psychology of online education, your remote instruction may not be as effective as you think. As I've stated before, I've had some training to running a hybrid class. But this training was institution-specific. It doesn't transfer to another institution. So over the summer, I've decided to enroll in the online Quality Matters training that appears to have a wider accreditation for online instructors. I know that the school that I'm at accepts such training as evidence that someone has the credentials to run online and hybrid classes. So I've signed up for 3 minimum courses that I know are part of the requirement to be certified as an online/hybrid instructor. I'm just preparing myself for the worst case scenario that we won't be back in full force in the Fall. If the courses that I'll be teaching either got moved to 100% remote, or as a hybrid class, then I want to be well-prepared for it and not get blindsided like this past semester.

Speaking of Chegg, one of my colleagues told me that he designed his final exam so that each student had a unique set of questions. He said that while the final exam was going on (remotely), he was monitoring Chegg, and much to his surprise, within the first hour, 4 of his questions appeared there. And because they were unique to the individual students, he automatically could identify of the students who posted the questions there and sought help.

So certainly the issue of dishonesty in remotely-administered exams came up quite a bit during our faculty meetings. Many of us certainly tried to make it harder for a student to "cheat", but of course, there's nothing to prevent a student to ultimately have someone else do the exam for him/her, which is the hardest thing to catch and collect evidence for. As I've said before, this whole debacle has simply re-enforced my skepticism of the knowledge and skill of a student taking an online course in physics and other sciences. I don't know anything about other subject matter, but I know that TurnitIn has been extensively used by courses that require a lot of essay writing to prevent outright copying and plagiarism.

This is going to be a never-ending battle if we continue to have more remote learning.

Zz.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes kith, Dr Transport, jasonRF and 3 others
  • #83
ZapperZ said:
Speaking of Chegg, one of my colleagues told me that he designed his final exam so that each student had a unique set of questions. He said that while the final exam was going on (remotely), he was monitoring Chegg, and much to his surprise, within the first hour, 4 of his questions appeared there. And because they were unique to the individual students, he automatically could identify of the students who posted the questions there and sought help.

Was it a small class that he could manually word the question differently for each student, or did he have some software that would automatically vary the questions from student to student?
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
  • #84
I just now reported a LIKE for ZapperZ's post, #82, but one single LIKE is not enough for that post, by a great distance.
 
  • #85
I'm not sure what to make of statements that the grades in my class were such and such without including some impression of who the professor is. I recall a grad student at my university who was from maybe Africa and he said the average grades in his undergrad classes had been around 55%, but he was a star in our program, easily getting A's, which for us was maybe 90%. I also was famous for having an average grade in my calculus class of say 50%, but one of my students placed highly in the departmental calculus competition, which was usually dominated by students from the advanced honors section. Indeed my student was the only one to place who was not in the advanced honors section. I was often criticized for disadvantaging my students in regard to departmental recognition for their relative grades, but I was trying to help them compete against students from the best schools. I may have been wrong, but I thought I meant well. My point is, I would be proud to have a B from ZZ.
 
  • Like
Likes atyy
  • #86
atyy said:
The teacher is dishonest because
(1) He deliberately set a flawed question
(2) He deliberately posted a flawed solution to Chegg
Setting flawed questions and posting flawed solutions are not dishonest in themselves - that happens, and when it does, one tries to correct the error. However, in this case, these were done purposefully, which makes it dishonest.
But if he had used a legit question and posted a legit solution, you'd be fine with the tactic? Some people feel that the tactic itself crosses the line. I don't think it does, but I doubt I'd go to that effort to try catch cheaters.
 
  • #87
vela said:
But if he had used a legit question and posted a legit solution, you'd be fine with the tactic? Some people feel that the tactic itself crosses the line. I don't think it does, but I doubt I'd go to that effort to try catch cheaters.

I'd have to think about it - it seems ok, but I still have my reservations as it seems to have an element of deception - I think one wants to be as straightforward as possible with the students - you know, do unto others as you would ... (ok, maybe different if I'm setting an entry exam for the NSA o0)). I think a clear cut case of something that is ok (and is already widely practiced) is to let your students know ahead of time that you will use Turnitin (or similar software) to check that they did the work and did not simply copy huge chunks of it from elsewhere. I think it is also fine to use things like Zoom to proctor an exam. The point is to be clear and completely transparent with the students ahead of the exam. Zoom proctoring, although ethically fine, is of course not without its downsides - students may already be stressed from having to suddenly switch to online courses, and having to cope with a complicated technological setup for an exam may add even more stress, eg. if they don't have good wifi at home.

There was an interesting article in APS News about moving courses online at short notice.
https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/202004/backpage.cfm
Moving Physics Courses Online on Short Notice
By Chandralekha Singh
 
  • #88
ZapperZ said:
[...]
So over the summer, I've decided to enroll in the online Quality Matters training that appears to have a wider accreditation for online instructors. I know that the school that I'm at accepts such training as evidence that someone has the credentials to run online and hybrid classes. So I've signed up for 3 minimum courses that I know are part of the requirement to be certified as an online/hybrid instructor. [...]

Great post- thanks for sharing! We have also encouraged instructors to make use of Quality Matters training that is available for them.
 
  • #89
Andy Resnick said:
Great post- thanks for sharing! We have also encouraged instructors to make use of Quality Matters training that is available for them.

A few of the instructors that had started the courses already from Quality Matters said that the courses were beneficial even for their face-to-face instructions, especially in incorporating various technologies as part of their instructions.

So I am definitely looking forward to such training.

Zz.
 
  • #90
Josh Blackman is a prominent constitutional law professor. He just made a post about some universities announcing that they will reopen live classes in the fall and that they will handle all the COVID testing and contact tracing. Meanwhile, other universities say that they will continue with distance learning.

I think the pressure on these decisions must be intense.

https://reason.com/2020/05/13/the-logistics-of-testing-and-contract-tracing-on-campus/

Blackman said: said:
Universities usually make changes at a glacial pace. Committees meet and discuss issues for months and months. And invariably, any new policy only slightly deviate from former policies. I am not confident that educational institutions can create public health infrastructures in the span of months. I am confident that attempting to create this infrastructure will be extremely expensive, and divert much needed funds from educational missions. Any tuition increase to cover these sorts of unpopular measures will be very unpopular. I am also confident these efforts will distract professors from their primary mission: improving educational opportunities for students. I do not have answers about the correct way forward.
 

Similar threads

Replies
97
Views
15K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K