A What is a good basis for coupled modes in a resonator?

Supantho Raxit
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
When trying to solve the Hamiltonian for coupled modes, what set of commutating operators can we use?
Suppose, there is an electro-optical modulator that can couple the neighboring modes in an optical ring resonator. The Hamiltonian for the system
Screen Shot 2020-11-22 at 12.56.00 AM.png


looks something like this^^ (see the attached image). Here we sum over all modes m and 𝜙0 is a parameter. What will be a good set of basis for the system? Suppose, we somehow restrict m to some upper bound m_max. What will be a good set of basis then?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since nobody else is answering... are the bs raising/lowering operators? Does the index m run through positive and negative integers?
 
  • Like
Likes Supantho Raxit
Yes, the b's are raising/lowering operators, and index m does run through positive and negative integers. The latter is a matter of choice since we can label our "sites" as we wish.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top