What is a 'magnetic substate'? (Magnetic-Optical Traps)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shukie
  • Start date Start date
Shukie
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
I'm doing a small paper on Magneto-Optical Traps, trying to explain how they work and I just encountered another paper which talked about ground states and excited states (J = 0, J = 1) and magnetic substates (m = 0 for J = 0 and m = -1, 0 or 1 for J = 1). I understand what ground states and excited states are, but can someone explain magnetic substates?

Also, I'm confused by this:

In this simplified case we consider an atom with a J = 0 ground state and a J = 1
excited state, illuminated by circularly polarized beams of light coming from the left
and the right. Because of its polarization, the beam from the left can only excite transitions to the m = +1 state, while the beam from the right can only excite transitions to the m = -1 state. The magnetic field is zero in the center, increases linearly in the positive x direction, and decreases linearly in the negative x direction. This field perturbs the energy levels so that the \Deltam = +1transition shifts to lower frequency if the atom moves to the left of the origin, while the \Deltam = -1transition shifts to higher frequency.

It's from near the bottom of page 2 from http://physweb.bgu.ac.il/COURSES/LAB_C/Laser%20Cooling%20and%20trapping/colorado%20mot.pdf . Could anyone tell me in laymans terms what exactly the bolded sentence means? As far as I understand, the atoms absorb photons, which excites them, then they emit them. What does this have to do with the magnetic substate?

Edit: I see now that I probably should have put this in the Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics subforum.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Electrons possesses angular momentum, due to both their intrinsic spin as well as their motion around the nucleus. We use J to denote the value of the angular momentum, in this case 0 or 1 for the two energy levels.

As for the magnetic substates ... since angular momentum is a vector, we can talk about a component in a particular direction, in this case the propagation direction of the laser beam. We denote this vector component of angular momentum by m.

If J=0 then magnitude of the angular momentum is zero, so obviously the component m can only be 0. But for J=1, the component of angular momentum can be m = -1, 0, or 1.

Because of its polarization, the beam from the left can only excite transitions to the m = +1 state, while the beam from the right can only excite transitions to the m = -1 state.

The beams are circularly polarized, so that each photon has an angular momentum of 1. Moreover, the angular momentum vector points in the direction of propagation: for the beam from the left it points to the right, so m=+1 for photons in the beam from the left. Likewise, m=-1 for photons in the beam from the right.

For a ground state atom, m=0. When it absorbs a photon, by conservation of angular momentum, the excited state atom will have whatever angular momentum the absorbed photon had: +1 for photons absorbed by the beam from the left, or -1 for the other beam.

Hope this helps ... there's a lot here, so feel free to ask followup questions if anything is still confusing you.

EDIT:
Slightly off-topic, but note the appearance of current DOE Secretary Steven Chu in many references at the end of the link you gave,
http://physweb.bgu.ac.il/COURSES/LAB_C/Laser%20Cooling%20and%20trapping/colorado%20mot.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you very much, that was extremely helpful. I do have some more questions. This is from the same article, from the bottom of page 2 again and the top of page 3:

The magnetic field is zero in the center, increases linearly in the positive x direction, and decreases linearly in the negative x direction. This field perturbs the energy levels so that the \Deltam = +1 transition shifts to lower frequency if the atom moves to the left of the origin, while the \Deltam = -1transition shifts to higher frequency. If the laser frequency is below all the atomic transition frequencies and the atom is to the left of the origin, many photons are scattered from the s + laser beam, because it
is close to resonance.

An atom in groundstate absorbs a photon and will take over whatever angular momentum the photon had. (1) This is what is meant by a \Deltam = +1 (or -1) transition, as described in the quote?

(2) The magnetic field itself does not exert a force on the atoms, right? The magnetic field is decreasing in -x direction and increasing in the +x direction. The left beam excites transitions to m = +1 and the right beam to m = -1. This somehow changes the resonance frequencies of the atoms. The lasers are set to below these resonance frequencies and due to the Doppler shift, atoms traveling toward a laser beam, will scatter more photons from that laser than the one they are moving away from and so it will experience a force in the direction of the origin. Is this correct?

If so, I don't quite understand the role the magnetic substates play in this. Is it because the magnetic substates makes the resonance frequencies position dependant and so you don't have to change the frequency of the laser due to the decreasing velocity of the atom (since the atom's resonance frequency changes)?
 
Thank you very much, that was extremely helpful. I do have some more questions. This is from the same article, from the bottom of page 2 again and the top of page 3:

The magnetic field is zero in the center, increases linearly in the positive x direction, and decreases linearly in the negative x direction. This field perturbs the energy levels so that the \Deltam = +1 transition shifts to lower frequency if the atom moves to the left of the origin, while the \Deltam = -1transition shifts to higher frequency. If the laser frequency is below all the atomic transition frequencies and the atom is to the left of the origin, many photons are scattered from the s + laser beam, because it
is close to resonance.

An atom in groundstate absorbs a photon and will take over whatever angular momentum the photon had. (1) This is what is meant by a \Deltam = +1 (or -1) transition, as described in the quote?

(2) The magnetic field itself does not exert a force on the atoms, right? The magnetic field is decreasing in -x direction and increasing in the +x direction. The left beam excites transitions to m = +1 and the right beam to m = -1. This somehow changes the resonance frequencies of the atoms. The lasers are set to below these resonance frequencies and due to the Doppler shift, atoms traveling toward a laser beam, will scatter more photons from that laser than the one they are moving away from and so it will experience a force back to the origin. Is this correct?

If so, I don't quite understand the role the magnetic substates play in this. Is it because the magnetic substates make the resonance frequencies position dependant and so you don't have to change the frequency of the laser due to the decreasing velocity of the atom (since the atom's resonance frequency changes due to the Doppler shift)?
 
(1) Yes.

(2)
The magnetic field would exert a force on excited state atoms, because (a) those atoms possesses a magnetic dipole moment, and (b) the magnetic field has a gradient.

However, that is not the force being discussed here. Nor are they talking about Doppler shifts creating a viscous force for atoms depending on what direction they are moving in.

Are you familiar with the Zeeman effect? That is at the root of this. Since the upper-state energy shifts with magnetic field, and the magnetic field is location-dependent, the upper state energy (and therefore the transition frequency) depends on location. So there is preferential absorption from one laser beam or the other depending on the atom's location, i.e. the location where the Zeeman shift brings the energy-level difference close to resonance with the laser.
 
I wasn't entirely familiar with the zeeman effect, but I knew it was involved. Once again your explanation cleared things up and I was able to finish my paper. Thanks again!
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top