What is a Possible Normalized Spin Wave Function?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bmb2009
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Qm Spin
bmb2009
Messages
89
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A number of spin 1/2 particles are run through a Stern-Gerlach apparatus and when the emerge they all have the same spin wave function (ψ1, ψ2)τ and 9/25 are in the +z direction and 16/25 are in the -z direction with the normal basis column vectors for +z and -z.

Determine a possible normalized spin wave function
1, ψ2)τ


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution




I am not sure where to start, all i can think of is to have 9/25(+z) = (9/25,0)τ and 16/25(-z) = (0, 16/25)τ to yield a total wave function of (9/25,16/25)τ
but I don't know what to do for the normalization or if my initial thought was even on the right track? Thanks for the guidance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are on the right track, but have confused the relationship between the wavefunction and the probability to find a particle in a given quantum state.

First, since you are worried about the normalization, if we are given a spin wavefunction ##( \psi_1 ~~\psi_2)^T##, can you express the norm of this vector in terms of ##\psi_{1,2}##?

Can you use the previous result to derive a normalized wavefunction (call it ##\Psi## for the same superposition of states?

Now, given ##\Psi## can you express the probability to find the particle in the +z direction in terms of ##\psi_{1,2}##? Think in terms of inner products.

Do the same for the -z direction.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top