What is a reasonable loss of energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vee9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Loss
AI Thread Summary
A loss of energy of 0.25 J or 0.0082 J for an 83 g ball rolling down a ramp is considered reasonable. However, understanding the context is crucial, including factors such as friction, ramp size, ramp angle, and air conditions. These variables significantly influence energy loss calculations. Without this information, it's challenging to assess the accuracy of the energy loss values. Contextual details are essential for a comprehensive analysis of energy loss in this scenario.
Vee9
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Does 0.25 J or 0.0082 J seem like a reasonable loss of energy in terms of a 83 g ball rolling down a ramp?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sure. But it would be better to have some vague idea what you're talking about. I.e. what is the friction? size of the ramp? ramp angle? air conditions?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top