What is an equation for distance which relates the jerk and snap?

  • Thread starter Thread starter warfreak131
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jerk
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between distance, jerk, and snap in physics. The original equation for distance, d = x + v_{i}t + \frac{1}{2}at^2, is expanded to include terms for jerk and snap, resulting in d = x + v_{i}t + \frac{1}{2}at^2 + \frac{1}{6}jt^3 + \frac{1}{24}st^4. The coefficients for each term are proposed to follow the pattern of 1/n! based on the power of time, t. The connection between jerk and acceleration is noted as jerk being the third derivative of position with respect to time. This formulation provides a more comprehensive equation for distance that incorporates higher-order derivatives of motion.
warfreak131
Messages
186
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Well I was perusing Wikipedia on physics and came across the "jerk" of an object, the rate of change of acceleration, as well as the "snap", the rate of change of the jerk. The units for these were \frac{m}{s^3} and \frac{m}{s^4} respectively.

Is there some way to relate these to distance in the equation:

d = x + v_{i}t + \frac{1}{2}at^2 ?

Homework Equations

d = x + v_{i}t + \frac{1}{2}at^2

The Attempt at a Solution



The only good guess I have is that the coefficient before each variable is equal to \frac{1}{n!} where n is the power that t is raised to.

So according to my rule, the equation including both snap and jerk would be:

d = \frac{1}{0!}xt^{0} + \frac{1}{1!}v_{i}t^{1} + \frac{1}{2!}at^2 + \frac{1}{3!}jt^3 + \frac{1}{4!}st^4

simplifying to:

d = x + v_{i}t + \frac{1}{2}at^2 + \frac{1}{6}jt^3 + \frac{1}{24}st^4

Am I right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
As much as I can say about it is

jerk= \frac{da}{dt} = \frac{d}{dt}(\frac{d^2x}{dt^2})= \frac{d^3x}{dt^3}


though I've never learned about jerk and snap .
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top