What Is Back EMF in DC Motors and How Does It Affect Performance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter navm1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Back emf Emf
AI Thread Summary
Back EMF in DC motors is the voltage generated by the motor's rotation, opposing the applied voltage and affecting current flow. When the motor is running, the effective voltage is the applied voltage minus the back EMF, which determines the current through the motor's internal resistance. If the motor stalls, the back EMF drops to zero, and the full applied voltage is used, leading to maximum current draw. Understanding the relationship between back EMF, applied voltage, and current is crucial for analyzing motor performance and efficiency. The discussion highlights the importance of these concepts in practical applications and problem-solving.
navm1
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A series dc motor:[/B] A dc motor with its rotor and field coils connected in series has an internal resistance of 2.00 Ω. When running at full load on a 120-V line, it draws a current of 4.00 A.

a) What is the emf in the rotor?
b) What is the power delivered to the motor?
c) What is the rate of dissipation of energy in the resistance of the motor?
d) What is the mechanical power developed?
e)What is the efficiency of the motor?
f)What happens if the machine that the motor is driving jams and the rotor suddenly stops turning?

Homework Equations


Vab = E + Ir,
P = I^2r

The Attempt at a Solution


This is a worked example in my textbook so the answers are all there but I'm finding it challenging to understand what is actually going on with some of the equations.

what exactly is the back emf and why am I adding it to Ir?

why does the current become V_ab/r only when the back emf goes to zero? what would be in the equation
I=v_ab/r if the back emf was still there?

would appreciate help with any of these questions and maybe an explanation of what is actually going on here. thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The motor rotates. As a result, there are wires cutting through a magnetic field. This generates a voltage, according to Faraday's Law, and this is opposite to the applied voltage. The current that flow depends on the net voltage.
There are many analogues to this relationship. You can think of the back EMF as like inertia in kinetics, and the resistance like friction.
In chemistry, there's Le Chatelier's principle.
 
thank you. how come the emf and Ir are added together in this case and not subtracted if they are opposite? then when the motor stalls the total voltage of 120v is used in the equation? was it 8 before?
 
navm1 said:
thank you. how come the emf and Ir are added together in this case and not subtracted if they are opposite?
No, I said it opposes the applied voltage. Ir is then what's left after subtracting the back EMF from the applied EMF.
navm1 said:
then when the motor stalls the total voltage of 120v is used in the equation? was it 8 before?
Was what 8 before?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top