Irrotational Flow: Understanding the Physical Implications of Curl(U)=0

  • Thread starter Thread starter Baggio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flow
AI Thread Summary
Irrotational flow, characterized by curl(U)=0, indicates that the velocity vector field is conservative and originates from a scalar potential, meaning fluid lines remain parallel without curling. This condition implies that individual fluid elements do not rotate, leading to a flow that is smooth and predictable. While some may confuse irrotational flow with laminar flow, they are distinct concepts; laminar flow can occur in scenarios that are not irrotational. The discussion highlights the significance of understanding these terms in fluid dynamics. Overall, the physical implications of irrotational flow are crucial for comprehending fluid behavior in various contexts.
Baggio
Messages
211
Reaction score
1
All the math based texts just simply derive or state curl(U)=0 but what does this physically mean?

Does it mean that a single fluid element does not rotate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It means that the velocity vector field is a conservative one,as it comes from a scalar potential (due to curl=0).Yes,the condition is called "irrotational flow" for good reason;basically the fluid lines do not curl,they are parallel wrt themselves at any moment of time.
http://discover.edventures.com/functions/termlib.php?action=&termid=532&alpha=r&searchString=

Daniel.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I suspect a good intro to superfluidity will cover this nicely ... let me check if I've got something bookmarked.
 
I would suspect an equivalent term for it would be:"laminar flow".

But that's just terminology.The basic idea behind is relevant.

Daniel.

EDIT:It would be really dull,if i wasn't wrong from time to time,huh...? :-p
 
Last edited:
There is no connection between the concepts "laminar flow" and "irrotational flow".
Couette flow is certainly laminar, but not at all irrotational.
Irrotational means what it says: the local angular velocity at a point is zero.

EDIT: Yes, I think I would yawn myself to death if you were right all the time..:wink:
(Possibly, that's what I ought to do, anyways?? :confused:)
 
Last edited:
I thought so, thanks.
 

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

Irrotational/Rotational Flows and Velocity Potentials
Replies
1
Views
2K
Applicability of potential flow theory (fluid dynamics)
Replies
3
Views
3K
MATLAB MATLAB: Fluid Flow - Curl of a Vector Field
Replies
2
Views
3K
I What's the physical meaning of Curl of Curl of a Vector Field?
Replies
5
Views
2K
Potential Flow Theory: Circulation and the Kutta-Jukowski Theorem
Replies
3
Views
2K
How does the pressure drop as a fluid flows through a pipe
2
Replies
73
Views
16K
Bernoulli Equation for Rotational Flow
Replies
4
Views
7K
Dynamics and convergence of a general flow network
Replies
11
Views
1K
Nested rotations in a fluid: Implications and Visualization
Replies
1
Views
2K
Jet Spread Rate K Values- Momentum diffusement
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top