What is nuclear symmetry energy?

fhqwgads2005
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
in a nutshell
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The strong force which is binding in nuclei is symmetric under the exchange neutron <-> proton (or down <-> up). There are other forces, for instance the electromagnetic repulsion between two protons, which are not binding and not symmetric. As the name suggests, the non-symmetric part is only a perturbation. So, using the asymmetry parameter
\alpha = \frac{N-Z}{A}
and the density \rho, we develop the energy density in the nuclear medium E(\rho,\alpha) as a Taylor series
E(\rho,\alpha) = E(\rho,0) + S(\rho)\alpha^2 + O(\alpha^4) + \cdots
and expanding around the saturation density \rho_s
S(\rho) = \left.\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial^2 E}{\partial\alpha^2}\right|_{\alpha=0,\rho=\rho_s}=a_v+\frac{p_0}{\rho_s^2}(\rho-\rho_s)+\cdots
The symmetry energy a_v\approx 29 \pm 2 MeV

source : The nuclear symmetry energy
 
So, is it useful to think of it as the energy required to increase the asymmetry between N and Z in the nucleus, say, by electron capture?
 
why in the symmetry energy only squared asymmetry parameter are exist and there is not the first power of asymmetry parameter?
 
Calculate the average potential energy of a brick in a brick wall of height N. Calculate the same for a wall of height Z. Keep the sum of the height A = Z + N fixed but allow their difference (N - Z) to be a free parameter. Find out the dependency of the total energy on that free parameter.
 
dauto said:
Calculate the average potential energy of a brick in a brick wall of height N. Calculate the same for a wall of height Z. Keep the sum of the height A = Z + N fixed but allow their difference (N - Z) to be a free parameter. Find out the dependency of the total energy on that free parameter.

Nice explanation. I would add that this topic is a little subtle because often we want to use these liquid-drop energies in the Strutinsky smearing technique, where we add in a quantum-mechanical shell correction. When we do that, we have two terms in the energy, classical and quantum-mechanical. We have to be careful not to double-count a particular energy in both the classical and the quantum-mechanical term (Strutinsky shell correction). As dauto correctly explains, the asymmetry energy is a quantum-mechanical effect arising from the exclusion principle. So you would think you should include it only in the quantum-mechanical term. However, the Strutinsky technique for, say, the neutrons, only adds a correction that represents the difference in binding energy between nucleus (N,Z) and the average of other nuclei (N+x,Z), where x is small, and this correction vanishes when the levels are uniformly spaced. So clearly the effect as described by dauto is not included in the Strutinsky correction, because it would occur even if the levels were uniformly spaced.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top