What is the Acceleration with a Coefficient of Kinetic Friction of 0.2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jtwitty
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the acceleration of a system involving a 1.0 kg hanging mass and a 4.0 kg block on a table, with a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.2. Participants express confusion about the context and implications of the coefficient of kinetic friction in this scenario. The main focus is on determining how this coefficient affects the acceleration of the block. The lack of clarity in the initial question prompts requests for further context to facilitate a proper understanding and calculation. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of context in physics problems involving friction and acceleration.
jtwitty
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
\muk

i don't know what it means??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Context helps.
 
Pengwuino said:
Context helps.


1. Suppose a hanging 1.0kg lab mass is attached to a 4.0kg block on the table


a. If the coefficient of kinetic friction, \muk is .2, what is the acceleration?
 
jtwitty said:
\muk

i don't know what it means??

At a guess I'd say the coefficient of kinetic friction, but it is difficult to tell without any context and Pengwuino said.
 
jtwitty said:
1. Suppose a hanging 1.0kg lab mass is attached to a 4.0kg block on the table


a. If the coefficient of kinetic friction, \muk is .2, what is the acceleration?
Here
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top