What is the Amplitude of a Mass-Spring System?

AI Thread Summary
A mass of 0.25 kg is attached to a spring with a spring constant of 35 N/m and oscillates on a frictionless surface with a speed of 1.04 m/s at equilibrium. The total energy of the system can be calculated using kinetic energy since there is no potential energy at the equilibrium point. The user struggled to find the amplitude using various equations but ultimately realized that all energy at equilibrium is kinetic. The clarification provided helped the user understand the solution better. The discussion emphasizes the importance of recognizing energy types in oscillating systems.
dukkie
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
A block of mass 0.25 kg is connected to a spring with a spring constant (k) of 35 N/m. It is oscillating on a frictionless horizontal surface. It's speed as it passes through equilibrium is 1.04 m/s. What is the total energy of the system?

I know that E=0.5(k)(A)^2. I just can't figure out the Amplitude. I know I can do it. I just don't know what kind of equation to use to get the amplitude. I have tried using x=A cos (wt) but that wasn't right. I have also tried vmax=A(k/m), that wasn't right either. I'm confused.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the body is connected to only one spring (if it was oscillating while attached to two springs which were both under compression at all times, then that would be different) then there is no compression or extension in the spring at the equilibrium point, hence there is no potential energy in the spring at that point.
All the energy is therefore just kinetic energy. You have the mass and the velocity at the equilibrium point, so you can find the KE.
 
Thanks so much for your help. I miss the most simple solutions sometimes. It helped a lot for you to explain it. Thanks again. I got it right.:smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top