What is the Angular Acceleration of a Rod?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the angular acceleration of a rod using torque and moment of inertia. The correct formula for angular acceleration is given as angular accel = Torque/Itot, where Torque is derived from gravitational force acting at the center of mass. The initial attempt yielded an incorrect angular acceleration due to miscalculating the distance 'L' in the torque equation. Participants emphasize that 'L' should represent the distance from the axis to the center of mass, not the end of the rod. Clarifications on mass considerations and adjustments to the torque equation lead to a more accurate calculation of angular acceleration.
euphtone06
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/6741/rodprobbw3.gif"

Homework Equations


Itot= 1/3MrL^2 + 2/5 MsR^2 + Ms(L + R)^2 = 235.69784
Cm= (Mr(L/2) + Ms(L+r))/(Mr+Ms) = 4.915

angular accel = Torque/Itot
Torque= 1/2Lmgcos(theta)

The Attempt at a Solution


I solved for Itot and Center of mass and got the correct answers but, I am having a difficult time getting the angular acceleration correct.

Aa= .5Lmgcos(theta)/(Itot)
= .5*6*4*9.8cos31/235.697
= .42767 rad/s^2 which was incorrect
Please help don't know what went wrong!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The 'L' in your angular acceleration formula should be the distance from the axis to the point where the force causing the torque is exerted. In this case the gravitational force can be treated as being exerted at the center of mass, not at the end of the rod.
 
Do you have to account for the total mass of the system?
.5*4.915*(4+4?)*9.8*cos31/235.697= .7 rad/s^2
 
4+4? Don't you mean 4+1? Yes, total mass of system. And it looks like the 1/2 in your torque equation is coming from the assumption that the center of mass is the center of mass of the rod. Get rid of it and just put L to be distance from axis to center of mass.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top