What is the angular velocity of the merry-go-round now?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the new angular velocity of a merry-go-round after four people step onto it. Initially, the merry-go-round has a diameter of 4.3 m and an angular velocity of 0.78 rad/s, with a moment of inertia of 1760 kg m^2. After the people step on, the calculated new angular velocity is 0.46 rad/s. For the second scenario, where the people jump off, the initial angular velocity should be updated to 0.46 rad/s, which affects the calculations. The confusion in the second part was clarified by recognizing the need to use the updated angular velocity from the first scenario.
AlvinC
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 4.3 m diameter merry-go-round is rotating freely with an angular velocity of 0.78 rad/s. Its total moment of inertia is 1760 kg m^2. Four people standing on the ground, each of mass 67 kg, suddenly step onto the edge of the merry-go-round.

1)What is the angular velocity of the merry-go-round now?

2)What if the people were on it initially and then jumped off in a radial direction (relative to the merry-go-round)?

Homework Equations



I_i*w_i=I_f*w_f

w_f=(I_i/I_f)*w_i

The Attempt at a Solution



For question 1 I plugged the numbers in and got 0.46 rad/s.
w_f=(1760/(1760+4*67*2.15^2)*.78 =0.46 rad/s

For question 2 since the people were on it initially i made I_f in my previous question to I_i and I_i to I_f. So it looked something like this:
w_f=(2998.83/1760)*.78 = 1.3 rad/s which was wrong. Not sure what I did wrong.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
AlvinC said:
For question 2 since the people were on it initially i made I_f in my previous question to I_i and I_i to I_f. So it looked something like this:
w_f=(2998.83/1760)*.78 = 1.3 rad/s which was wrong. Not sure what I did wrong.

i also get same answer

you sure that wi in second case is .78 and not .56 like we found in second case ?
 
Oh yess! I forgot to make .46 as my new initial angular velocity. Much Thanks!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top