What is the annual rate of increase for a gallon of milk?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mustang
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    increase Rate
AI Thread Summary
The price of a gallon of milk increased from $1.79 to $2.15 over two years, resulting in a total increase of $0.36. This translates to an annual increase of $0.18 per year. However, some participants in the discussion suggest calculating the percentage increase instead, using the formula for compound growth. The derived annual growth rate, assuming compounding, is approximately 9.6%. The discussion highlights the importance of clarifying assumptions regarding compounding periods when calculating rates of increase.
mustang
Messages
169
Reaction score
0
A gallon of milk was $1.79 two years ago. Today, it's $2.15. Find the rate it increased each year. :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PLEASE do not double post! If this really is homework, then it shouldn't be posted under "general mathematics" and if it is not it shouldn't be posted here!

The price of milk, according to this problem increased from $1.79 to $2.15, an increase of ($2.15-1.79)= $0.36. Since that occurred over two years, the rate of increase is ($0.36)/(2 years)= $0.18 per year.
 
I don't think that's what he's looking for. I think he wants a percentage per year. c is initial cost, C is final cost, r is rate, n is how many times (years?)

C = (c)(r)^n

\frac{C}{c} = (r)^n

^n\sqrt{\frac{C}{c}} = r

r = 1.095955

After the first year, the price of milk will be 1.96176 which is a change of 0.17176.
After the second year, the price of milk is 2.15 which is a change of 0.18824
 
There is no way to tell. For all you know, the price could have gone up to $2.15 the first day. From the info given, I would of course not assume that. Apparently ShawnD is assuming the rate to be compounded once per year. The answer would be different for the arguably equally valid assumption that it is compounded continuously. I suppose you could declare your assumption, but make sure that you are not required to use a different compounding period.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top