What is the Behavior of Particle Distribution Near Maximum in Thermal Physics?

Gungator
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There is a box of volume V that is divided into two equal parts: Left side = V/2 = right side.
The problem is:
Assume that there are n = (Na/2) + k particles in the left hand partition where k is a small integer ( k << Na). Show that the behavior near the maximum where n = Na/2 is gaussian (i.e., quadratic in k).



Homework Equations


Na = 6.022x1023

This is what I don't know. I don't know if I'm supposed to use the binomial distribution or the gaussian(normal) distribution.

I'm in Thermal Physics because statistics was not a pre-req but we're using a lot of statistics and I've never had a course on it. So if anyone could help point me in the right direction of how to go about showing this, I would greatly appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I feel like information is missing. I'm assuming that the particles in the box are ideal gas particles? If so I think you need to find the partition function. To give you a hint the partition function for an ideal gas is found using an integral (wikipedia it and hopefully you might have seen it before). If there are (Na/2)+k in the left hand part then there are (Na/2)-k in the right hand part. Each partition function is independent so if you found the partition function for either side, to get the total partition function for the whole box you could just multiply the two together. I haven't worked through it but I can see ((Na/2)+k)((Na/2)-k) is going to give you a quadratic.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top