What is the best way to draw diagrams for virtual work on rigid bodies?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenges of drawing diagrams for virtual work in rigid body mechanics. The user seeks help in determining vertical reactions and bending moments using virtual work, expressing confusion about diagram creation. Participants clarify the principle of virtual work and suggest using displacement diagrams, while also addressing mistakes in the user's calculations. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately representing forces and moments in diagrams, ultimately leading to a better understanding of the problem. The exchange emphasizes collaborative learning in tackling complex engineering concepts.
hopelesskarma
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Im having real trouble with drawing diagrams for virtual work. Can someone please, please help me!

We were asked, in the diagram i posted, to find 1)vertical reaction at F, 2) all reactions at A, 3) bending moment and shear force at B using virtual work.

i think i know how to do the actual working out but to do that i need the diagram, which i don't know how to draw. Any help/explanation would be very much appreciated! thanks in advance!

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


 

Attachments

  • virtual work attempted soln 001.jpg
    virtual work attempted soln 001.jpg
    20.7 KB · Views: 468
  • virtual work.jpg
    virtual work.jpg
    30.6 KB · Views: 521
Physics news on Phys.org
the diagrams don't seem to be showing up...:frown: how long normally does it take to be approved?
 
To find the value of a statical quantity Q at a point x0, draw the displacement diagram of the system "caused" by a differential displacement at the point x0 "in the direction" of the quantity Q, and apply the principle of virtual work. (Sounds nice in theory, I know, but this is still a hint. :smile:)
 
Dear Radou

Yes that is the general principal of virtual work as i understand it too but its very confusing to apply.

Ive realized, since posting the diagrams up, that i made a few mistakes in my attempted solution. Since it takes so long for attachments to be approved maybe i can just describe in words what i think and hopefully u'll be able to follow... :redface:

For the bending moment at B, I've used the convention in my worked solution. However I've modified the diagram like this: The force acting on the beam will turn the beam clockwise, so it will slope down from the top of B to D, passing through C. From D to E it will be a straight constant line. The extension from D to F will be like it was in the original diagram.

Thus sum bending moment at B=0
M(B) x d* + (-)V(B) x 1.5d* + 10kN x 3d* = 0
M(B) x d* + (-)(-20kNm) x 1.5d* + 10kN x 3d* = 0
M(B) + 30 +30 = 0
M(B) = -60kNm

NOTE: V(B) stands for the shear at B. i worked it out to be -20
d* is the angle between the virtual line and the real line

However using statics i found the moment at B to be -30 not -60. Did i draw my diagram wrong? Or is it my working out? thanks in advance!
 
hopelesskarma said:
However using statics i found the moment at B to be -30 not -60. Did i draw my diagram wrong? Or is it my working out? thanks in advance!

Your diagram is wrong. If you find it hard to picture the displacement of the system, you can always use Kennedy's theorem to draw the exact displacement diagram.
 
We havnt learned kennedy's theorem yet and googling it turned up nothing educational either...or at least nothing i could understand. Is there a simpler way about it?
 
hopelesskarma said:
We havnt learned kennedy's theorem yet and googling it turned up nothing educational either...or at least nothing i could understand. Is there a simpler way about it?

Well, what I'm talking about is no hard way. First of all, do you know how to draw displacement diagrams for mechanisms?
 
radou said:
Well, what I'm talking about is no hard way. First of all, do you know how to draw displacement diagrams for mechanisms?

Yes, i think so. I know that the displacement diagrams can bend at pins but must pass through the roller/rocker supports etc, and remains zero at fixed supports. And initially it goes in whichever direction the force is acting.

Thanks a lot for going through this stuff with me! i know that it can be hard to explain...really appreicate it.
 
hopelesskarma said:
Thanks a lot for going through this stuff with me! i know that it can be hard to explain...really appreicate it.

No need to thank, that's why we're here! :wink:

hopelesskarma said:
Yes, i think so. I know that the displacement diagrams can bend at pins but must pass through the roller/rocker supports etc, and remains zero at fixed supports. And initially it goes in whichever direction the force is acting.

Ok, http://usera.imagecave.com/polkijuhzu322/pf/displ.JPG" the displacement diagram of the system (for the bending moment at B). I named the disks "i" and "ii". Of course, you have to add the forces to the diagram and use the principle of virtual work now.

Edit: your statics seems to be wrong too, since the moment you should obtain does not equal 30.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
So in the diagram, where did DF go? Or it doesn't move?

Yes using the diagram the moment at B should equal 15...my statics was wrong but i know wat went wrong now :-)
 
  • #11
hopelesskarma said:
So in the diagram, where did DF go? Or it doesn't move?

Yes using the diagram the moment at B should equal 15...my statics was wrong but i know wat went wrong now :-)

The member DF isn't important, since there is no force to do any work on that member. (Formally, DF can't be seen in the diagram; it coincides with the projection of disc ii.)
 
Back
Top