What is the border line that constitutes v c

  • Thread starter Thread starter chris_0101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line
AI Thread Summary
In relativistic physics, the gamma factor is crucial for calculating time dilation, where proper time is multiplied by gamma to find dilated time. When velocities are very small, the binomial approximation can simplify calculations, but there is no strict limit where it fails; it becomes less accurate as velocity increases. A common guideline suggests using the approximation for speeds up to 10% of the speed of light, as non-relativistic and relativistic mechanics diverge by about 1% at this threshold. Understanding this boundary helps in deciding when to apply the approximation versus the original formula. Accurate application of these concepts is essential for solving relativistic problems effectively.
chris_0101
Messages
59
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Relativistic questions usually require an expression to solve which in this case will be called gamma (shown below). Now when solving for time dilation for example, we can multiply proper time by gamma to find the dilated time. However, when a calculator is used and the value of velocity is very small, we modify gamma in order to approximate the dilated time, this is known as the binomial approximation (shown below).

My main question is, what value is the limit or border line should I look out for to determine whether to use the approximation or the original formula


Homework Equations


Gamma = 1/sqrt(1-(\beta2)) where \beta = v/c

Binomial approximation:
sqrt(1-(\beta2)) = (1-(\beta2))1/2 \approx 1-(1/2)(\beta2))
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There isn't really a definite value at which the approximation breaks down. The binomial approximation just gets continuously worse and worse as v gets bigger and bigger.

That said:
The rule of thumb usually is that the non-relativistic limit ends at 10% of the speed of light. This is when the results of non-relativistic mechanics differ from relativistic mechanics by 1%.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top