What is the Charge on a Bead Accelerating in a Uniform Electric Field?

AI Thread Summary
A small charged bead with a mass of 1.0 g is released in a uniform electric field of 200,000 N/C, resulting in an upward acceleration of 20 m/s². The discussion revolves around determining the charge on the bead using force equations. Participants clarify that the relevant equations include F = qE, F = mg, and F = ma, emphasizing the application of Newton's second law. By setting the sum of forces, Eq - mg = ma, the relationship between the forces becomes clearer. The problem highlights the importance of correctly applying dynamics principles to find the charge.
Sarah88
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A small charged bead has a mass of 1.0 g. It is held in a uniform electric field E= 200,000 N/C up. When the bead is released, it accelerates upward with an acceleration of 20 m/s^2. What is the charge on the bead?

Homework Equations


F= qE
F= mg
(possibly F= ma)


The Attempt at a Solution



I tried this problem multiple different ways including:
mg-Eq= 0
as well as Eq= ma

However, I wasn't sure how to relate the three force equations (mg, ma, Eq) together for this problem (because all seem relevant in this problem). Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Sarah! Welcome to PF! :smile:
Sarah88 said:
I tried this problem multiple different ways including:
mg-Eq= 0
as well as Eq= ma

However, I wasn't sure how to relate the three force equations (mg, ma, Eq) together for this problem (because all seem relevant in this problem). Thank you!

Well, you're nearly there :wink:

as in almost all dynamics problems, just apply good ol' Newton's second law …

sum of forces = mass times acceleration …

what do you get? :smile:
 
Hi,
Thanks for the welcome to the forum :)

Well, the sum of forces equal to ma: Eq- mg (oppose each-other) = ma, it makes a lot more sense when you take into account Newton's second law. Thank you for your help! :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top