What Is the Coherent State for This EM Field?

Raz91
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
\Huge

Homework Statement



Consider a state of the EM field which satisfies
\left\langle \textbf{E}_x(\vec{r})\right\rangle =f(\vec{r})

Find a coherent state which satises these expectation values.

Homework Equations



\textbf{E}(\textbf{r})=\frac{i}{\sqrt{2 V}}\sum _{\textbf{k},\lambda } \sqrt{\omega _k}\left(e^{-i \textbf{k}\textbf{ r}} a^{\dagger }{}_{\textbf{k},\lambda } \hat{\epsilon }^*{}_{\textbf{k},\lambda }+e^{-i \textbf{k}\textbf{r}} a_{\textbf{k},\lambda } \hat{\epsilon }_{\textbf{k},\lambda }\right)

Coherent State :

a|\alpha \rangle =\alpha |\alpha \rangle

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to calculate this , but i just don't understand what am I suppose to prove here?
isn't it trivial that the expectation value will be a function of r (vector) ?

I've got this :
<br /> \left\langle \textbf{E}_x(r)\right\rangle =\sum _{k,\lambda } \sqrt{\frac{2 \omega _k}{V}} \textbf{Im}\left(\alpha e^{-i k r} \epsilon _{x_{k,\lambda }}\right)Thank you !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The point is to find a coherent state such that the expectation value of the electric-field components (operators) take the given (classical) field f.
 
I still don't understand where is it given ?
it's just a "new name" for <Ex> , isn't it?

of course the expectation value won't be an operator... so I don't see what's so special here or what should I do ...

or f(r) is a known function in Electrodynamics that i should know ?

Thank u ...
 
No, it's not a known function. You just assume a function \vec{f}(t,\vec{x}) and look for a coherent state |\psi of the electromagnetic field such that
\langle \psi | \hat{\vec{E}}|\psi \rangle=\vec{f}(t,\vec{x}).
 
but according to the defination of the electric field , any coherent state will lead to such an expectation value because it's an eigen-state of the annihilation operator.
 
Last edited:
As u can see , my result is depended on r (vector) for an arbitrary coherent state |alpha>...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top