What is the Complementary Sequence to 3' GTGAACTGC 5'?

Thread starter shawonna23
Start date Jul 8, 2010
Tags

Dna

AI Thread Summary

The complementary sequence to the DNA strand 3' GTGAACTGC 5' is 5' GCAGTTCAC 3'. The correct answer was identified as option c. The discussion confirmed this answer through a brief exchange. The participants focused on determining the accurate complementary sequence based on standard base pairing rules. The thread concluded with acknowledgment of the correct solution.

Jul 8, 2010

shawonna23

Homework Statement

A DNA strand with the sequence 3' GTGAACTGC 5' is complementary to the sequence

Choose one answer.
a. 5' GTGAACTGC 3'
b. 3' GACGTTACA 5'
c. 3' GCAGTTCAC 5'
d. 5' GCACTTCAC 3'
.

Homework Equations

3' GTGAACTGC 5'
5' CACTTGACG 3'

The Attempt at a Solution

C: 3' GCAGTTCAC 5'

Physics news on Phys.org

Jul 8, 2010

Ygggdrasil

Science Advisor

Insights Author

Gold Member

Correct.

Jul 8, 2010

shawonna23

thanks!

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...

View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

View full post »