What is the Correct Angle for Canonical Transformation?

Chen
Messages
976
Reaction score
1
Hello,

I need to solve the Hamiltonian of a one-dimensional system:

H(p, q) = p^2 + 3pq + q^2

And I've been instructed to do so using a canonical transformation of the form:

p = P \cos{\theta} + Q \sin{\theta}
q = -P \sin{\theta} + Q \cos{\theta}

And choosing the correct angle so as to the get the Hamiltonian of an harmonic oscillator.

Applying this transformation, I get:

H(P, Q) = P^2 + Q^2 - 3/2 (P^2 - Q^2) \sin{2 \theta} + 3 P Q \cos{2 \theta}

And as far as I can see, no choice of angle will get me to an Hamiltonian of an harmonic oscillator.

Am I correct? Can someone please check my calculation?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I got the same expression for H(P,Q) as you, and I can't see what angle would give a nice form either. You'd want to get something like

H(P,Q) = \frac{P^{2}}{2} + kQ^{2}

from which you can then get the frequency from, but that would want \sin 2\theta = \frac{1}{3} which isn't going to drop the 3PQ term you've got.
 
All you need is to get \cos 2\theta=0. So what about \theta=\pi/4?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top