What is the Correct Derivation for Refrigeration Efficiency?

  • Thread starter Thread starter irule
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    General
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the derivation of refrigeration efficiency from an old exam question. The confusion arises from a specific algebraic step where Qc is used in both the numerator and denominator. The correct approach involves dividing both parts by Qc to express the equation in terms of the ratio Qc/Qh. An error in sign is noted during this process, but it cancels out later in the derivation. The final correct expression for refrigeration efficiency is presented as T_C/(T_H - T_C).
irule
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do you mean where they go from
Qc/(Qh-Qc) to (Qc/Qc)/(1-Qh/Qc)?

They simply divided both numerator and denominator by Qc. The goal here is to rewrite everything not in terms of Qh and Qc separately, but only in their ratio Qc/Qh (or Qh/Qc).
 
But they're clearly making a sign error when doing this. Luckily for them, they make the same sign error a second time, so the effects cancel. A correct derivation would be:

\frac{Q_C}{Q_H - Q_C} = \frac{1}{Q_H/Q_C - 1} = \frac{1}{T_H/T_C - 1} = \frac{T_C}{T_H - T_C}
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top