What is the correct transformation for a 4-vector in special relativity?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the correct transformation of 4-vectors in special relativity using the Lorentz transformation tensor. The user presents a matrix for transforming 4-vectors from one frame to another and seeks validation on the accuracy of their derived equations, particularly concerning the addition and subtraction signs. They also inquire about the transformation of the 4-vector potential and the corresponding electric and magnetic field components in different frames. Despite attempts to solve these problems, the user expresses uncertainty about the correctness of their answers and the assignment of vector components. Clarification on these transformations and signs is requested for further understanding.
physicsforumsfan
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I got a 3 part Qs: γ=1/√1-v^2-c^2

Part A

Homework Statement



Consider the Lorentz transformation tensor

Matrix
Row 1: [ γ 0 0 -vγ/c]
Row 2: [ 0 1 0 0 ]
Row 3: [ 0 0 1 0 ]
Row 4:-[vγ/c 0 0 γ ]

for transforming 4-vectors from frame S to \overline{S} according to\overline{A}^{\mu} = L^{\mu} _{v} A^{v} . The coordinate system is x^{0} =ct, x^{1} = x, x^{2} = y, x^{3} = z .

The Attempt at a Solution



Doing the transformation and then solving for it gives the answer:

d/d\overline{t}=γ(d/dt-vd/dx), d/d\overline{x}=γ(v/c^2 d/dt - d/dx), d/d\overline{y} = d/dy, d/d\overline{z}=d/dz

That's the answer I get but I am not sure about if I have the addition and substraction signs correct.

Part B

Homework Statement



In above question, if the 4-vector potential is given by \underline{A}=(\phi/c, Ax, Ay, Az) in frame S what are its components in frame \overline{S}?

The Attempt at a Solution



Again solving for and getting the answer, I am confused on the addition and subtraction signs:

\overline{A}=(γ\varphi/c + γv/c Ax, γAx+ γv\varphi/c^2, Ay, Az)

Part C

Homework Statement



In Part B, the electric and magnetic fields are defined in frames S and \overline{S} by

E^{(3)}=-∇\varphi-dA^{(3)}/dt, \overline{E}^{(3)}=-∇\overline{\varphi}-d\overline{A}^{(3)}/d\overline{t}, B^{(3)}=∇xA^{3}, \overline{B}^{(3)}=\overline{∇}x\overline{A}^{(3)},
\overline{A}=(\overline{\varphi}/c, \overline{A}x,

If

\overline{A}y, \overline{A}z)=(\overline{\varphi}/c, \overline{A}^{(3)})

what is value of \overline{E}x?

The Attempt at a Solution



Again solving for it I get my answer in which I am unsure of the addition and subtraction signs.

\overline{E}x=Ex, \overline{E}y=γ(Ey+vBz), \overline{E}z=γ(Ez-vBy)

I am also not sure if the have the vector components assigned to the correct axis.

Help would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

no reply?

Help?
 
I'm not even sure what the questions are.
 
MisterX said:
I'm not even sure what the questions are.

In Part A - I am supposed to find the transformation of the L matrix using that tensor equation. Is my transformation correct? It was my attempt at the question.

In Part B - Again, are the components of \overline{S} correct (ie. is \overline{A} correct)? It was my attempt at the question.

In Part C - It is a bit crowded (the formulae) but essentially they are the electric and magnetic field equations E, E (dashed), B and B (dashed) of the S and S (dashed) frames.

A (dashed, the 'if' was supposed to start before the A dashed equation and not in the middle)

I am supposed to find the E (dashed, the 'x' is a typo, sorry) components of this system (from the A dashed equation of part B). If the above is wrong then so is my following working. Are the + and - signs in the answer? It was my attempt.

Thanks for brings that up.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top