What is the depth of a merged river with given stream dimensions and speeds?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the depth of a merged river formed by two streams with different dimensions and speeds. The first stream has a width of 9.3 m, depth of 4.3 m, and speed of 2.5 m/s, while the second stream is 6.8 m wide, 4.0 m deep, and flows at 2.7 m/s. The merged river has a width of 10.2 m and a speed of 2.7 m/s, prompting the question of how to determine its depth. Participants confirm that the conservation of mass principle, expressed through the equation (A_stream1)(v_stream1) + (A_stream2)(v_stream2) = (A_river)(v_river), applies to the scenario. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding fluid dynamics in merging streams.
mbrmbrg
Messages
485
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Figure 14-43 shows the merging of two streams to form a river. One stream has a width of 9.3 m, depth of 4.3 m, and current speed of 2.5 m/s. The other stream is 6.8 m wide and 4.0 m deep, and flows at 2.7 m/s. The width of the river is 10.2 m, and the current speed is 2.7 m/s. What is its depth?

Homework Equations



R_v=Av=constant

A_1v_1=A_2v_2

The Attempt at a Solution



Sure, the rate flow should be constant for an ideal river of varying cross-sectional area, but I don't understand what to do when more fluid is added. Since two streams are merging, do I say that (A_{stream 1})(v_{stream1})+(A_{stream2})(v_{stream2})=(A_{river})(v_{river})?
 

Attachments

  • hrw7_14-43.gif
    hrw7_14-43.gif
    47.4 KB · Views: 850
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mbrmbrg said:
Since two streams are merging, do I say that (A_{stream 1})(v_{stream1})+(A_{stream2})(v_{stream2})=(A_{river})(v_{river})?
Looks good to me. That's conservation of mass (the continuity equation) in action.
 
Thank you!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top