What is the Depth of the Potential Well for an Odd Bound State Solution?

Dextrine
Messages
102
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


The odd bound state solution to the potential well problem bears many similarities to the zero angular momentum solution to the 3D spherical potential well. Assume the range of the potential is 2.3 × 10^−13 cm, the binding energy is -2.9 MeV, and the mass of the particle is 940 MeV. Find the depth of the potential in MeV. (The equation to solve is transcendental.)

Homework Equations


$$\sqrt{\frac{-E}{E+V0}}=-Cot[\sqrt{\frac{2m(E+V0)}{hbar^2}}a]$$

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried plotting the left and right hand side equations as functions of V0 and found where they intersected. This of course led to infinitely many solutions. The question doesn't ask for the minimum depth of the potential so I'm assuming I am going about this the wrong way.

My minimum depth came out to around 18.5 MeV[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi there,

I followed your calculations, ended up with 18.26 MeV.
This is the lowest value of V0 that gives one odd bound state.
If we interpret the binding energy (ionization energy) as the energy of the lowest odd state, then that way the solution is unique.
 
[edit] strange errors and a double posting ?? sorry
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top