What is the difference between internal energy and enthelpy?

Click For Summary
Internal energy (U) is the energy contained within a thermodynamic system, while enthalpy (H) is defined as H = U + PV, where P is pressure and V is volume. The key difference between the two is that enthalpy accounts for the work done by the system due to pressure and volume changes, making it a broader measure of energy. Changes in internal energy are related to kinetic and potential energy variations among molecules, while changes in enthalpy also incorporate the mechanical energy associated with pressure-volume work. If pressure remains constant, the change in enthalpy equals the heat flow into or out of the system. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurate thermodynamic analysis.
abi.ayan
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
could anyone explain me the fundamental different between internal energy and enthalpy? I searched and found the below definitions for both terms.
INTERNAL ENERGY:In thermodynamics, the internal energy is the energy contained by a thermodynamic system.

ENTHALPY:Enthalpy is a measure of the total energy of a thermodynamic system.


I really couldn't find the differences.Is enthalpy a subset of internal energy or internal energy a subset of enthalpy?
 
Science news on Phys.org
abi.ayan said:
could anyone explain me the fundamental different between internal energy and enthalpy? I searched and found the below definitions for both terms.
INTERNAL ENERGY:In thermodynamics, the internal energy is the energy contained by a thermodynamic system.

ENTHALPY:Enthalpy is a measure of the total energy of a thermodynamic system.I really couldn't find the differences.Is enthalpy a subset of internal energy or internal energy a subset of enthalpy?
Enthalpy is defined as H = U + PV so the difference between H (enthalpy) and U (internal energy) is PV, the product of pressure and volume.

When a system changes thermodynamic state, there may be a change in Internal energy or a change in PV, or a combination of both.

The change in internal energy, dU, relates to the change in kinetic energy of the molecules plus their change in potential energy relative to each other if there are intermolecular forces.

The change in PV, d(PV), relates to the work done on or by the system (PdV) plus the volume x change in pressure (VdP) which is a kind of mechanical potential energy or mechanical stored energy. This VdP term can be confusing because it is actually included in the change in internal energy (dU)*.

Together these changes add up to the change in enthalpy. If there is no change in pressure (VdP=0) then by the first law of thermodynamics the change in enthalpy is the heat flow into or out of the system:

ΔHconstant P = ΔU + PΔV = Q

* [footnote: You have referred to a statement that enthalpy represents the total energy of the system (see, for example, the Wikipedia article referred to by UltrafastPED). This is not correct. The energy of the system is the internal energy. A change of this internal energy is equal to the change in enthalpy only if volume and pressure do not change. The change in enthalpy is equal to the energy flow into or out of the system during a thermodynamic process if pressure is constant. If pressure is not constant the change in enthalpy differs from the heat flow by that VdP term. For example, if volume is constant, the heat flow Q = ΔU and the change in enthalpy differs from the change in system energy by VΔP.

AM
 
Last edited:
One line definitions you can find online are typically oversimplified and wrong.
 
Always try to understand and use the mathematical definitions. Wordy definitions such as "Enthalpy is a measure of the total energy of a thermodynamic system" are used to build intuition but are secondary to the mathematical definitions and are almost completely useless by themselves.
 
The misinformation in the Wikipedia article has now been corrected. It no longer makes the incorrect statement: "Enthalpy is a measure of the total energy of a thermodynamic system.". The error was made in August 2010 and has persisted ever since, despite criticism in the Talk section of the article.

Thanks to the OP for the post pointing out the understandable confusion. Who knows how many others have been misled over the last 3 1/2 years! This is a good example of why it is important not to rely only upon Wikipedia.

AM
 
Thread 'Can somebody explain this: Planck's Law in action'
Plotted is the Irradiance over Wavelength. Please check for logarithmic scaling. As you can see, there are 4 curves. Blue AM 0 as measured yellow Planck for 5777 K green Planck for, 5777 K after free space expansion red Planck for 1.000.000 K To me the idea of a gamma-Ray-source on earth, below the magnetic field, which protects life on earth from solar radiation, in an intensity, which is way way way outer hand, makes no sense to me. If they really get these high temperatures realized in...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
452
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
26K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
45K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
18K