What is the dot product of tensors?

sugarmolecule
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I was trying to follow a proof that uses the dot
product of two rank 2 tensors, as in A dot B.

How is this dot product calculated?

A is 3x3, Aij, and B is 3x3, Bij, each a rank 2 tensor.

Any help is greatly appreciated.

Thanks!

sugarmolecule
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've never heard of a dot product of tensors. Can you give us more details? Tip: If this is from a book, check if it's available at books.google.com. You might even be able to show us the specific page where you found this.
 
Hi,

I found this reference online that lists a potential intepretation:

www.math.mtu.edu/~feigl/courses/CFD-script/tensor-review.pdf

It lists the dot product of two rank-2 tensors U, V in 3-space as:

UikVkj

Does that look right?

Thanks,

sugarmolecule
 
nevermind i was thinking of something else.
 
Last edited:
sugarmolecule said:
Hi,

I found this reference online that lists a potential intepretation:

www.math.mtu.edu/~feigl/courses/CFD-script/tensor-review.pdf

It lists the dot product of two rank-2 tensors U, V in 3-space as:

UikVkj

Does that look right?

Thanks,

sugarmolecule
I suspected that. I didn't know that anyone uses term "dot product" about rank 2 tensors, but if they do, it's logical that they mean precisely that. I don't see a reason to call it a dot product though. To me, that's just the definition of matrix multiplication, and if we insist on thinking of U and V as tensors, then the operation would usually be described as a ''contraction" of two indices of the rank 4 tensor that you get when you take what your text calls the "dyadic product" of U and V.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top