What is the equation for capacitance of a coaxial cable?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the equation for the capacitance of a coaxial cable per meter length, emphasizing the use of Gauss's law. The participants note that the standard capacitance formula for parallel plate capacitors is not applicable here. The correct capacitance formula is identified as C = (2πε) / ln(R2/R1), where R1 and R2 are the inner and outer radii, respectively. The approach involves integrating the electric field derived from Gauss's law to find the potential difference. The conversation highlights the need for proper integration techniques to arrive at the final capacitance expression.
jumpboy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v68/jumpboyb/?action=view&current=scan0001.jpg"
Pretty much looking for a general equation for capacitance of a coaxial cable per meter length.

given:
-a diagram (click link)
-two radii
-dielectric material
-outer conductor is grounded (V = 0V)

Homework Equations


C = Q/V
C=A/d\epsilon0


The Attempt at a Solution


used the second equation but won't work since its for a parallel plate capacitor.

thats it! I'm lost on this one
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the best way to approach this problem is with Gauss's law. You need to set an arbitrary charge (it will vanish in the end.). Use a cylinder as your Gaussian surface. Hope this helps
 
Still stuck. Here's what I did with Gauss' Law in mind. (btw, the answer is (2pi\epsilon)/ln(R2/R1) and that's not pi to the epsilon not power btw.)

So, with Gauss, you have integral of E dot dA which equals Q/\epsilon.

Capacitance - Q=VC...so subsitute that back into the gauss equation so you have...

EA = VC/epsilon \Rightarrow C= EA[epsilon]/V

Electric potential is the negative rate of change of a electric field...ie E = -dV/ds = -V/r where r = R2 - R1

C=-rA[epsilon]=-2pi(r)3[epsilon]

and yea...nothing. I see I need to integrate something, but idk where or what logic to use for it.
 
To get V you must integrate the expression for E with respect to dr. You can't just use E = -V/r which is true only for the simplest 1D case.
 
Right, try adding the integral of E dot dl or dr (whatever you guys call it.) into your arsenal.
 
the expression you want to integrate is dV = -[Q/(2Pi*R)] with limits from R1 to R2 (inner to outter). This is obtained through gauss's law, saying that EA = Qin/Episilon, solving for E and substituting for the original integral of dV = -[E dot ds]. The area "A" is 2*Pi*r because after the length is taken into acount, it will account for the surface area.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top