What is the equation for light intensity decrease through glass?

Fosock
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Any help here would be appreciated so much..

Is there an equation that links distance of glass traveled through to light intensity on the other side?

Obviously, the light intensity will decrease as the light travels through greater amounts of glass, but is there an trend I am looking for with my results? Any pattern?

Any info on this would mean everything to me, I am seriously at the end of my tether with a really poor teacher that won't help me out as 'that's not what his department does'. I'm not even allowed to hand in a draft, isn't that kinda wierd? I might go to another teacher I reckon, seems kinda fishy.

Laters, thanks SO much to anything at all that comes back.. I am completely willing to pay for any help.. I can post cash if you live in England, if not let me know what to do if you want paying or anything.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The intensity of light decreases by the equation
I=I_0e^{-x/\delta}.\quad\delta is called the
"attenuation length". It is given by
\delta=\sqrt{\frac{\epsilon}{\mu}}\left(\frac{c}{4\pi\sigma}\right)<br /> in Gaussian units). The derivation of this is a bit involved.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top