What is the Error in Linking the Derivatives of the Traveling Wave Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Poetria
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Waves
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the incorrect linking of the first derivatives of the traveling wave equation, specifically the relationship between the first partial derivatives \(f_x\) and \(f_t\). The user initially states \(f_t = -v f_x\), which is identified as potentially incorrect. The conversation suggests that the question may actually pertain to the second partial derivatives \(f_{xx}\) and \(f_{tt}\), which are relevant in the context of the wave equation. This indicates a misunderstanding of the derivatives involved in wave mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave equations in physics
  • Familiarity with partial derivatives
  • Knowledge of the traveling wave concept
  • Basic calculus, specifically differentiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the wave equation in physics
  • Learn about the significance of second partial derivatives in wave mechanics
  • Explore the relationship between first and second derivatives in differential equations
  • Review examples of traveling wave solutions and their properties
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying wave mechanics, as well as educators and anyone interested in understanding the mathematical foundations of wave equations.

Poetria
Messages
267
Reaction score
42
Homework Statement
The traveling wave:
f(x,t) = sin(x-v*t)
It's the question about the relationship between ##f_x## and ##f_t##
Relevant Equations
My reasoning was:

$$f_x=cos(x-v*t)$$
$$f_t=-v*cos(x-v*t)$$

so the relation between the two is:

##f_t=-v*f_x##

Why is this wrong?
My reasoning was:

$$f_x=cos(x-v*t)$$
$$f_t=-v*cos(x-v*t)$$

so the relation between the two is:

##f_t=-v*f_x##

Why is this wrong?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think it's wrong?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and Poetria
It's an automatic grader. :) I don't have a teacher.
 
Maybe the question asks for the relationship between the second partial derivatives ##f_{xx},f_{tt}## cause those do appear in what we call the "wave-equation".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Poetria
Delta2 said:
Maybe the question asks for the relationship between the second partial derivatives ##f_{xx},f_{tt}## cause those do appear in what we call the "wave-equation".
You may be right, I will try. An excellent idea. :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
What was the question exactly as it was worded?
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K