What is the error in the solution for Example 25.3.1(a) on page 11?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hydroxide0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rod
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying the error in the solution for Example 25.3.1(a) regarding the conservation of angular momentum. The initial attempt incorrectly assumes that the impulse from the pivot during the instantaneous collision has no effect, leading to a flawed calculation of the angular speed after the collision. It is clarified that while the collision is instantaneous, the impulse can still be significant, affecting the momentum of the system. The correct approach involves using conservation of angular momentum about the pivot point, which accounts for the torque from the impulse. Ultimately, the confusion arises from the misunderstanding of how instantaneous forces can still impart significant impulses during collisions.
hydroxide0
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem is Example 25.3.1 (a) on page 11 here: http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-01sc-physics-i-classical-mechanics-fall-2010/angular-momentum-1/conservation-of-angular-momentum/MIT8_01SC_coursenotes25.pdf.

Homework Equations


3. The Attempt at a Solution [/B]
Here is my (apparently incorrect) solution:

We shall take our system to be the object and rod and use conservation of momentum. (We can do so because the only external forces acting on the system are the force of the ceiling on the rod and the gravitational force on the rod, and immediately before the collision these cancel. So if we assume the collision is nearly instantaneous, then there is no net external force on the system during the collision and momentum is conserved.) Equating the momentum of the system immediately before and after the collision gives
mv_0=m\frac{v_0}{2}+m_rV
where ##V## is the speed of the center of mass of the rod immediately after the collision. Since the rod is uniform, the center of mass is a distance ##l/2## away from the pivot point. Thus if we let ##\omega_2## be the angular speed of the rod immediately after the collision, then we have ##V=\omega_2\frac l2##. Plugging this into the above equation gives ##mv_0=m\frac{v_0}{2}+m_r\omega_2\frac{l}{2}##, which we can solve for ##\omega_2## to get ##\omega_2=\frac{mv_0}{m_rl}##.

But according to the solution in the link ##\omega_2=\frac{3mv_0}{2m_rl}##, so there must be something wrong with this... if anyone can point out the error, it would be much appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
When the mass hits the rod, there is an impulse from the pivot on the top of the rod. This impulse is not known, so you are better off using the conservation of angular momentum about the pivot (as they did in their solution). That way, the impulse force has no torque.
 
But if we assume the collision is instantaneous (as they did in their solution), then there can't be any net impulse on the system, right?
 
Why can't there be an impulse if the collision is instantaneous?

EDIT: I might not have been clear on this: the impulse is in the ##- \hat{i}## direction.
 
Correct me if I'm wrong about this, but since a force acting over zero time causes zero impulse, the horizontal force of the pivot causes zero impulse during the instantaneous collision. Therefore the momentum just before and just after the collision are equal.
 
hydroxide0 said:
Correct me if I'm wrong about this, but since a force acting over zero time causes zero impulse, the horizontal force of the pivot causes zero impulse during the instantaneous collision.
Not if the force is infinite (or very very large), which is usually the case for collisions.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top