What is the Expectation Value of Momentum for a Wave Function?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the expectation value of momentum for a given wave function, expressed as ψ(x,t) = R(x,t) exp(i S(x,t)). The participant grapples with the application of the momentum operator and the normalization condition, questioning the validity of certain mathematical manipulations. It is clarified that one cannot interchange the order of the momentum operator and the wave function without proper justification. Ultimately, the expectation value is acknowledged to be complex due to the arbitrary nature of the functions R and S, making simplification challenging. The conversation concludes with an understanding that the result may not yield a straightforward expression.
Feldoh
Messages
1,336
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Consider a wave function \psi (x,t) = R(x,t) exp(i S(x,t)) what is the expectation value of momentum?

Homework Equations


<f(x)> = \int^{\infty}_{-\infty} \psi^* f(x) \psi dx

\hat{p} = -i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}

The Attempt at a Solution


This is for an intro to modern class so I don't really have a formal background with eigenvalues/vectors yet so this is a bit confusing.

Can I just say that <p> = \int^{\infty}_{-\infty} \psi^{*} \hat{p} \psi dx = \int^{\infty}_{-\infty} \hat{p} \psi^{*} \psi dx ?

If so by the normalization condition <p> = -i hbar which I don't think can be the case.

So...

&lt;p&gt; = \int^{\infty}_{-\infty} R exp(-i S) \hat{p} R exp(i S) dx

= -i\hbar \int^{\infty}_{-\infty} R exp(-i S) * [R&#039; exp(i S) + i R S&#039; exp(i S)]dx

= -i\hbar \int^{\infty}_{-\infty} R R&#039; + i R^2 S&#039; dx

= ?

I don't really see anything from there...

I'm tempted to just say 0, but I'm not sure that the function being evaluated is odd.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Feldoh said:
Can I just say that &lt;p&gt; = \int^{\infty}_{-\infty} \psi^{*} \hat{p} \psi dx = \int^{\infty}_{-\infty} \hat{p} \psi^{*} \psi dx ?

No, you cannot.
The first equality is true, but the second is not. You cannot just pull an operator through a function, because
\psi^* \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \psi \neq \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \psi^* \psi
which is ambiguous too, as it could mean either
\frac{\partial}{\partial x} \left( \psi^* \psi \right) = \frac{\partial \psi^*}{\partial x} \psi + \psi^* \frac{\partial\psi}{\partial x}
or
\left( \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \psi^* \right) \psi

Instead you just plug in the wave-function. Start by writing down what is
\hat p \psi(x, t)
 
I all ready did apply the momentum operator like that in my derivation:

i\hbar [R&#039; exp(i S) + i R S&#039; exp(i S)]

I just assumed that the second expression was wrong and did it the (semi)correct way.
 
Ah, I see that now.
Yes you did it right.
The result isn't something very beautiful, but I suppose one would not expect that... after all the wave function depends on R and S, both of which are arbitrary functions on spacetime, so one cannot "predict" the expectation value on physical grounds.
 
Ah, all right I just had in my mind that it would come out to be something the come be simplified a bit more. Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top