What is the expression for the spectrum of a hot gas with Doppler broadening?

broegger
Messages
257
Reaction score
0
Hi,

A very hot gas is enclosed in an oven with a small window. The gas molecules emits radiation at a characteristic wavelength. I assume that because of the thermal motion of the molecules the emitted wavelengths will form a spectrum of some kind (Doppler broadening.) I am trying to derive an expression for this spectrum, but I don't know how... Any hints?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. There would be no Doppler broadening for molecules moving parallel to the plane of the window. Molecules moving away would have red shift, and molecules moving toward the window would have a blue shift. The higher the temperature, the greater the range of velocities.

Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution - http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kinetic/kintem.html#c2
 
Like Astronuc said, you know the Doppler shift as a function of atomic velocity, and you know the distribution for atomic velocities. It's basically a change of variables.
 
I tried to perform the calculation of the spectrum.
I got the spectrum dP/df (power emitted each frequency unit):

dP/df = Pt >< dv/df >< fr(v)

Pt is the total power emitted by the gas, fr(v) is the Maxwell distribution regarding the radial component of speed (component in observer's direction), and v(f) is the inverse of f(v) which gives the doppler frequency as a function of the radial velocity.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top