What is the Fault in My Derivation of the Wave Equation in a Conductor?

Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27

Homework Statement


http://web.phys.ntnu.no/~ingves/Teaching/TFY4240/Exam/Exam_Dec_2008_tfy4240.pdf
problem 2a)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Hi. In problem 2a I was supposed to find a wave equation, however while digging around in maxwell's equations, I found this result:

https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xap1/v/t1.0-9/16410_10204393293009062_1155886601331102418_n.jpg?oh=44e1d9886a54e34274c00437ed952ca5&oe=5505B805&__gda__=1427040332_aace122d9214b5db9de482b3e631a490

which effectively implies that ##\nabla^2 \vec{E} = 0## if you insert it into the wave equation they want me to find (look in problem 2a to see what I mean), which obviously can't be right.

But where is the fault in my derivation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ahh, but of course, the charge density is zero in an ideal conductor, is it not? Then what I get out will be nonsense because of that?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top