What is the final speed of the bicyclist rolling downhill?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jorge0531
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bicycle Rolling
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the final speed of a bicyclist rolling downhill from a height of 127 meters, encountering a friction force of 292 Newtons. The initial speed at the top is 8 m/s, and the energy conservation equation is applied to find the final speed at the bottom. Initial calculations yield a result of 12.95 m/s, but a participant identifies a transcription error, correcting the total energy to 113617.4 J and arriving at a final speed of 14.96 m/s. The importance of accurate calculations and transcription in physics problems is emphasized. The final speed of the bicyclist, accounting for friction, is thus determined to be 14.96 m/s.
jorge0531
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1. A bicyclist on an old bike (combined mass: 89 kg) is rolling down (no pedaling or braking) a hill of height 127 m. Over the course of the 355 meters of downhill road, she encounters a constant friction force of 292 Newton. If her speed at the top of the hill is 8 m/s, what is her speed at the bottom of the hill?



2. 1/2 m(V1)^2 + mgh1 = 1/2m(V2)^2 + mgh2 + Ffrx



3. 1/2(89 kg)(8 m/s)^2 + (89 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(127 m) = 1/2(89 kg)V2^2 + (292 N)(355 m)

111125.4 J = 44.5 kg V2^2 + 103660 J

sqrt(7465.4 J / 44.5 kg) = V2

V2 = 12.95 m/s


Somehow I'm doing something wrong because this velocity is wrong. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jorge0531 said:

3. 1/2(89 kg)(8 m/s)^2 + (89 kg)(9.8 m/s^2)(127 m) = 1/2(89 kg)V2^2 + (292 N)(355 m)

111125.4 J = 44.5 kg V2^2 + 103660 J



I think it is just a transcription error. I am getting 113617.4 J rather than 111125.4 J, and a final velocity of 14.96 m/s.
 
you were right :P thank you
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top