What is the flaw in my logic for solving this Newton's 2nd law problem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a Newton's 2nd law problem involving two blocks connected by a pulley. The main confusion arises from the sign convention used for the forces acting on the hanging block. Initially, the user believed the force equation should be -mg - T, but later realized that the correct formulation is T - mg, considering the upward direction as positive. The tension in the rope acts upward while gravity pulls downward, leading to the conclusion that the forces are in opposition. Ultimately, the correct understanding of the sign convention is crucial for accurately solving the problem.
David112234
Messages
105
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


http://postimg.org/image/z9uzlyt3p/

Homework Equations


F=MA
W=MG

The Attempt at a Solution


the force on the block must be gravity *its mass (weight) since it hangs, but because of the pulley and other box pulling the other way, creating an T, the force on the hanging block should be -MG - T (from M2).
-Mg because the wight is hanging down
I tried T-MG, but it was wrong as well

It tells me it is wrong, what is the flaw in my logic?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I understand the situation-- it is in their strange x and y coordinates. Apparently they intend x and y to be the same thing-- advancement of the system such that block 2 goes up and block 1 goes down. It's not what they say, so it's a poor problem, but it would make sense as a way of expressing the main constraint on the system. This means down is the positive direction, so the answer is mg-T. Then the acceleration A is the same for both blocks, which is presumably how they want their constraint to work out.
 
  • Like
Likes David112234
I originally tough the same, but it is also not the correct answer
 
Well, what we can say for sure is T and mg are in opposite directions, and they are the only forces on block 1, so you can be sure it is either T-mg or mg-T. It all depends on what sign convention their "y" coordinate is using, but since they don't say, you have to guess. The sensible one is the same as x, so that would make mg-T correct. It sounds like mg+T is the only one you haven't tried, but there's no universe where that answer makes any sense at all, unless they are imagining that the sign of the number that substitutes for T is positive at the left end of the rope and negative at the right end, which would be a pretty unusual way to look at the situation!
 
  • Like
Likes David112234
David112234 said:
the force on the block must be gravity *its mass (weight) since it hangs, but because of the pulley and other bo
David112234 said:

Homework Statement


http://postimg.org/image/z9uzlyt3p/

Homework Equations


F=MA
W=MG

The Attempt at a Solution


the force on the block must be gravity *its mass (weight) since it hangs, but because of the pulley and other box pulling the other way, creating an T, the force on the hanging block should be -MG - T (from M2).
-Mg because the wight is hanging down
I tried T-MG, but it was wrong as well

It tells me it is wrong, what is the flaw in my logic?
It clearly states that up is to be considered as positive for part (E).

Is the rope pulling up on Block 1 or is it pushing Block 1 down?

It should be T - m1g .

Are you sure you didn't have a typo when you tried that.
 
  • Like
Likes David112234
Ken G said:
. It sounds like mg+T is the only one you haven't tried, but there's no universe where that answer makes any sense at all, unless they are imagining that the sign of the number that substitutes for T is positive at the left end of the rope and negative at the right end, which would be a pretty unusual way to look at the situation!

I got it, it turns out its -mg+T . The reasoning behind it is because even tho the mass on the left is pulling town, the tension is redirected as up, it pulls the hanging mass up, and gravity down. Thanks for the help.
 
Yes, it does make sense since they did specifically say that the +y direction is up, as Sammy5 pointed out. I thought that couldn't be the case because you said you had tried that one, but you must have made an oversight. Personally, I would not have used that +y convention, I would have made the +y direction be down, since then a_1 = a_2 is the key constraint in solving for the motion. They would have to use a_1 = - a_2 when they solve it, which I find unnecessarily awkward, but certainly not wrong.
 
Back
Top